Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36863398›Full record

ArticleDie Rehabilitation2023

[Need for Action and Research in Psychosomatic and Orthopaedic Rehabilitation from the Point of View of Rehabilitants and Individuals who work in Rehabilitative Care].

Lisa Ann Baumann, Natalie Schüz, Aike Hessel, Sina Obiedzinski, Anna Levke Brütt

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Die Rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparing an in-person workshop and a postal Delphi survey for involving health service users in health care and health research prioritization.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa Ann BaumannDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.ORCID 0000-0002-8368-6858
Natalie SchüzSozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Oldenburg-Bremen, Oldenburg.
Aike HesselSozialmedizin, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Oldenburg-Bremen, Oldenburg.
Sina ObiedzinskiDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
Anna Levke BrüttDepartment für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the need for practical action and research in psychosomatic and orthopaedic rehabilitation from the perspective of rehabilitants and individuals who work in rehabilitative care.

methodsThe project was divided into an identification and a prioritization phase. In the identification phase, 3872 former rehabilitants, 235 employees from three rehabilitation clinics and 31 employees of the German Pension Insurance Oldenburg-Bremen (DRV OL-HB) were invited to participate in a written survey. The participants were asked to name relevant needs for action and research for psychosomatic and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The answers were evaluated qualitatively using an inductively developed coding system. Practical fields of action and research questions were formulated from the categories of the coding system. In the prioritization phase, the identified needs were ranked. For this purpose, 32 rehabilitants were invited to a prioritization workshop and 152 rehabilitants, 239 clinic employees and 37 employees of the DRV OL-HB to a two-round written Delphi survey. The resulting prioritized lists from both methods were combined into a top 10 list.

resultsIn the identification phase, 217 rehabilitants, 32 clinic employees and 13 employees of the DRV OL-HB participated in the survey, in the prioritization phase, 75 rehabilitants, 33 clinic employees and 8 employees of the DRV OL-HB in both survey rounds of the Delphi survey, and 11 rehabilitants in the prioritization workshop. A need for practical action primarily in the implementation of holistic and individual rehabilitation, in quality assurance and in the education and participation of rehabilitants was identified, as also a need for research primarily on access to rehabilitation, structures in the rehabilitation setting (e. g., inter-agency cooperation), the design of rehabilitative interventions (more individualized, more suitable for everyday life), and the motivation of rehabilitants.

conclusionThe identified needs for action and research include many topics that have already been identified as problems in previous research projects and by various actors in rehabilitation. In the future, there needs to be increased focus on the development of strategies for dealing with and solving the identified needs, as well as on the implementation of these strategies.

Indexed as

OrthopedicsGermanyHumansPsychophysiologic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID36863398
PMCPMC10581817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.