Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36863285›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2023

Naloxone expansion is not associated with increases in adolescent heroin use and injection drug use: Evidence from 44 US states.

Emilie Bruzelius, Magdalena Cerdá, Corey S Davis, Victoria Jent, Katherine Wheeler-Martin, Christine M Mauro, Stephen Crystal, Katherine M Keyes, Hillary Samples, Deborah S Hasin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Price Sensitivity and Information Barriers to the Take-Up of Naloxone.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie BruzeliusColumbia University, Department of Epidemiology, 722 W. 168th St. New York, NY, 10032, USA. Electronic address: eb2674@cumc.columbia.edu.
Magdalena CerdáNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Corey S DavisNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA; Network for Public Health Law, 7101 York Avenue South, #270 Edina, MN 55435, USA.
Victoria JentNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Katherine Wheeler-MartinNYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, 180 Madison Avenue 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Christine M MauroColumbia University, Department of Biostatistics, 722 W. 168th St. New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Stephen CrystalRutgers University, 112 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Katherine M KeyesColumbia University, Department of Epidemiology, 722 W. 168th St. New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Hillary SamplesRutgers University, 112 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Deborah S HasinColumbia University, Department of Psychiatry, 722 W. 168th Street, Room 228F, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Silvia S MartinsColumbia University, Department of Epidemiology, 722 W. 168th St. New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USNew York University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNational Health Law Program · US

Funding

Examining the Synergistic Effects of Cannabis and Prescription Opioid Policies on Chronic Pain, Opioid Prescribing, and Opioid OverdoseR01DA045872 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CERDA, MAGDALENA, MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2019 to 2023
$4.3M
Multi-level associations between opioid use and overdose: Individual, clinical, and population-based risk factors for fatalityK01DA049950 · NIDA · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI SAMPLES, HILLARY · 2020 to 2024
$981k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA049950NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNaloxone distribution is central to ongoing efforts to address the opioid overdose crisis. Some critics contend that naloxone expansion may inadvertently promote high-risk substance use behaviors among adolescents, but this question has not been directly investigated.

methodsWe examined relationships between naloxone access laws and pharmacy naloxone distribution with lifetime heroin and injection drug use (IDU), 2007-2019. Models generating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) included year and state fixed effects, controlled for demographics and sources of variation in opioid environments (e.g., fentanyl penetration), as well as additional policies expected to impact substance use (e.g., prescription drug monitoring). Exploratory and sensitivity analyses further examined naloxone law provisions (e.g., third-party prescribing) and applied e-value testing to assess vulnerability to unmeasured confounding.

resultsAdoption of any naloxone law was not associated with changes in adolescent lifetime heroin or IDU. For pharmacy dispensing, we observed a small decrease in heroin use (aOR: 0.95 [CI: 0.92, 0.99]) and a small increase in IDU (aOR: 1.07 [CI: 1.02, 1.11]). Exploratory analyses of law provisions suggested that third-party prescribing (aOR: 0.80, [CI: 0.66, 0.96]) and non-patient-specific dispensing models (aOR: 0.78, [CI: 0.61, 0.99]) were associated with decreased heroin use but not decreased IDU. Small e-values associated with the pharmacy dispensing and provision estimates indicate that unmeasured confounding may explain observed findings.

conclusionNaloxone access laws and pharmacy naloxone distribution were more consistently associated with decreases rather than increases in lifetime heroin and IDU among adolescents. Our findings therefore do not support concerns that naloxone access promotes high-risk adolescent substance use behaviors. As of 2019, all US states have adopted legislation to improve naloxone access and facilitate use. However, further removal of adolescent naloxone access barriers is an important priority given that the opioid epidemic continues to affect people of all ages.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdolescentAnalgesics, OpioidHeroinHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidHeroinNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdolescentHarm reductionHeroinInjection drug useNaloxonePolicy analysis

Identifiers

PMID36863285
PMCPMC11268161
OpenAlexW4322632076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.