ArticlePloS one2023
Adversarial confound regression and uncertainty measurements to classify heterogeneous clinical MRI in Mass General Brigham.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Advanced AI Frameworks for Dual PPAR α/γ Agonist Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven transformative applications in disease diagnosis technology.Medical review (2021) · 2025Review
- Differential dementia detection from multimodal brain images in a real-world dataset.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Robust and interpretable AI-guided marker for early dementia prediction in real-world clinical settings.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Challenges of implementing computer-aided diagnostic models for neuroimages in a clinical setting.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we introduce a novel deep learning architecture, MUCRAN (Multi-Confound Regression Adversarial Network), to train a deep learning model on clinical brain MRI while regressing demographic and technical confounding factors. We trained MUCRAN using 17,076 clinical T1 Axial brain MRIs collected from Massachusetts General Hospital before 2019 and demonstrated that MUCRAN could successfully regress major confounding factors in the vast clinical dataset. We also applied a method for quantifying uncertainty across an ensemble of these models to automatically exclude out-of-distribution data in AD detection. By combining MUCRAN and the uncertainty quantification method, we showed consistent and significant increases in the AD detection accuracy for newly collected MGH data (post-2019; 84.6% with MUCRAN vs. 72.5% without MUCRAN) and for data from other hospitals (90.3% from Brigham and Women's Hospital and 81.0% from other hospitals). MUCRAN offers a generalizable approach for deep-learning-based disease detection in heterogenous clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.