ArticlePloS one2023
Toward characterizing cardiovascular fitness using machine learning based on unobtrusive data.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploiting Unsupervised Free-Living Data for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Estimation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Peak Oxygen Uptake Prediction From Resting and Submaximal Variables of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Individual cardiorespiratory fitness exercise prescription for older adults based on a back-propagation neural network.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a non-invasive approach to measure the maximum oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), which is an index to assess cardiovascular fitness (CF). However, CPET is not available to all populations and cannot be obtained continuously. Thus, wearable sensors are associated with machine learning (ML) algorithms to investigate CF. Therefore, this study aimed to predict CF by using ML algorithms using data obtained by wearable technologies. For this purpose, 43 volunteers with different levels of aerobic power, who wore a wearable device to collect unobtrusive data for 7 days, were evaluated by CPET. Eleven inputs (sex, age, weight, height, and body mass index, breathing rate, minute ventilation, total hip acceleration, walking cadence, heart rate, and tidal volume) were used to predict the [Formula: see text] by support vector regression (SVR). Afterward, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to explain their results. SVR was able to predict the CF, and the SHAP method showed that the inputs related to hemodynamic and anthropometric domains were the most important ones to predict the CF. Therefore, we conclude that the cardiovascular fitness can be predicted by wearable technologies associated with machine learning during unsupervised activities of daily living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.