ArticlePloS one2023
Exploring the views of Singapore junior doctors on medical curricula for the digital age: A case study.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the integration of digitalization and AI in general medicine curricula in German-speaking Europe: a comprehensive survey.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Digital health literacy in medical education: a scoping review of current challenges and development strategies.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Understanding the gap: a balanced multi-perspective approach to defining essential digital health competencies for medical graduates.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Organizational Leaders' Views on Digital Health Competencies in Medical Education: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Dearth of digital health education: the need for an accelerated medical curriculum reform in Malaysia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Striving for excellence in a little red dot: Exploring the evolution of oral and maxillofacial surgery training and practice in Singapore.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Review
- Patients' Expectations of Doctors' Clinical Competencies in the Digital Health Care Era: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study Among Patients.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Unveiling the digital future: perspectives of Hungarian physicians under 35 years old on eHealth solutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the perspectives of medical trainees on the impartation of digital competencies in Singapore's medical school curricula. It also considers how the medical school experience can be strengthened in order to bridge potential gaps in the integration of these competencies in the local curricula. Findings were drawn from individual interviews with 44 junior doctors from Singapore's public healthcare institutions including hospitals and national specialty centers. House officers and residents from different medical and surgical specialties were recruited using purposive sampling. Data was interpreted using qualitative thematic analysis. The doctors were in their first to tenth year of post-graduate training. Thirty of them graduated from the three local medical schools whereas 14 others were trained overseas. Overall, they felt insufficiently prepared to utilize digital technologies in view of their limited exposure to such technologies in medical school. Six key reasons were identified: lack of flexibility and dynamism within the curriculum, dated learning style, limited access to electronic health records, gradual uptake of digital technologies in the healthcare sector, lack of an ecosystem that promotes innovation, and lack of guidance from qualified and available mentors. Equipping medical students with skills relevant to the digital age would benefit from a concerted effort from multiple stakeholders: medical schools, medical educators and innovators, as well as the government. This study bears important implications for countries that seek to bridge the 'transformation gap' brought about by the digital age, which is defined as the sharp divergence between innovations that healthcare providers recognize as important but for which they feel insufficiently prepared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.