Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862631›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Assembling the perfect bacterial genome using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing.

Ryan R Wick, Louise M Judd, Kathryn E Holt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive Response ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Anaerobic riboflavin degradation by human gutJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  5. Draft genomes ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Revised complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Complete genome ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Piperacillin-tazobactam resistance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Microbiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  20. Gene conversion is a key driver of diversity hotspots inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan R WickDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8349-0778
Louise M JuddDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
Kathryn E HoltDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3949-2471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A perfect bacterial genome assembly is one where the assembled sequence is an exact match for the organism's genome-each replicon sequence is complete and contains no errors. While this has been difficult to achieve in the past, improvements in long-read sequencing, assemblers, and polishers have brought perfect assemblies within reach. Here, we describe our recommended approach for assembling a bacterial genome to perfection using a combination of Oxford Nanopore Technologies long reads and Illumina short reads: Trycycler long-read assembly, Medaka long-read polishing, Polypolish short-read polishing, followed by other short-read polishing tools and manual curation. We also discuss potential pitfalls one might encounter when assembling challenging genomes, and we provide an online tutorial with sample data (github.com/rrwick/perfect-bacterial-genome-tutorial).

Indexed as

NanoporesOryziasAnimalsGenome, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingTechnology

Identifiers

PMID36862631
PMCPMC9980784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.