Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862496›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

An Augmented Reality Technology to Provide Demonstrative Inhaler Technique Education for Patients With Asthma: Interview Study Among Patients, Health Professionals, and Key Community Stakeholders.

Antonia O'Connor, Kelsey Sharrad, Charmaine King, Kristin Carson-Chahhoud

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonia O'ConnorAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-3842
Kelsey SharradTranslational Medicine and Technology Group, Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0301-7161
Charmaine KingTranslational Medicine and Technology Group, Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3612-4745
Kristin Carson-ChahhoudAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany people with asthma use incorrect inhaler technique, resulting in suboptimal disease management and increased health service use. Novel ways of delivering appropriate instructions are needed.

objectiveThis study explored stakeholder perspectives on the potential use of augmented reality (AR) technology to improve asthma inhaler technique education.

methodsOn the basis of existing evidence and resources, an information poster displaying the images of 22 asthma inhaler devices was developed. Using AR technology via a free smartphone app, the poster launched video demonstrations of correct inhaler technique for each device. In total, 21 semistructured, one-on-one interviews with health professionals, people with asthma, and key community stakeholders were conducted, and data were analyzed thematically using the Triandis model of interpersonal behavior.

resultsA total of 21 participants were recruited into the study, and data saturation was achieved. People with asthma were confident with inhaler technique (mean score 9.17, SD 1.33, out of 10). However, health professionals and key community stakeholders identified that this perception was misguided (mean 7.25, SD 1.39, and mean 4.5, SD 0.71, for health professionals and key community stakeholders, respectively) and facilitates persistent incorrect inhaler use and suboptimal disease management. Delivering inhaler technique education using AR was favored by all participants (21/21, 100%), particularly around ease of use, with the ability to visually display inhaler techniques for each device. There was a strongly held belief that the technology has the capacity for improving inhaler technique across all participant groups (mean 9.25, SD 0.89, for participants; mean 9.83, SD 0.41, for health professionals; and mean 9.5, SD 0.71, for key community stakeholders). However, all participants (21/21, 100%) identified some barriers, particularly regarding access and appropriateness of AR for older people.

conclusionsAR technology may be a novel means to address poor inhaler technique among certain cohorts of patients with asthma and serve as a prompt for health professionals to initiate review of inhaler devices. A randomized controlled trial design is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this technology for use in the clinical care setting.

Indexed as

asthmaaugmented realitydisease managementinhaler techniquemobile phonesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36862496
PMCPMC10020912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read40
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.