ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2023
Insights into the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticoagulant drugs for patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis: a systematic analysis and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Gut microbiota-activated PLCγ2 monocytes drive atrial fibrillation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Rivaroxaban: Association ofPharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Dose Optimization of Rivaroxaban in Elderly Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Populations Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Observational
- Association of rivaroxaban plasma trough concentrations with clinical characteristics and outcomes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Establishment of an Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamics Model of Apixaban in Chinese Healthy Population Adjusting for Key Genetic Variants.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Article
- More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.Blood advances · 2024Observational
- [Drug therapy for arterial hypertension and atrial fibrillation in frail patients : Are there any new insights and recommendations?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.Blood advances · 2024Observational
- Idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated patients with acute stroke: a review and clinical update.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Use of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism treatment at extremes of body weight, renal and liver function: an illustrated review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Older adults, the fastest growing population, represent almost 50% of all users of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Unfortunately, we have very little relevant pharmacological and clinical data on DOACs, especially in older adults with geriatric profiles. This is highly relevant as pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) often differ substantially in this population. Hence, we need to obtain a better understanding of the PK/PD of DOACs in older adults, to ensure appropriate treatment. This review summarises the current insights into PK/PD of DOACs in older adults. A search was undertaken up to October 2022 to identify PK/PD studies of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, that included older adults aged ≥ 75 years. This review identified 44 articles. Older age alone did not influence exposure of edoxaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran, while apixaban peak concentrations were 40% higher in older adults than in young volunteers. Nevertheless, high interindividual variability in DOAC exposure in older adults was noted, which can be explained by distinctive older patient characteristics, such as kidney function, changes in body composition (especially reduced muscle mass), and co-medication with P-gp inhibitors, which is in line with the current dosing reduction criteria of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran had the largest interindividual variability among all DOACs since its dose adjustment criterion is only age, and thus it is not a preferable option. Additionally, DOAC exposure, which fell outside of on-therapy ranges, was significantly related to stroke and bleeding events. No definite thresholds linked to these outcomes in older adults have been established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.