Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862334›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2023

COVID-19 Therapeutics: Use, Mechanism of Action, and Toxicity (Vaccines, Monoclonal Antibodies, and Immunotherapeutics).

Michael Chary, Alexander F Barbuto, Sudeh Izadmehr, Marc Tarsillo, Eduardo Fleischer, Michele M Burns

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. 1-L Transcription of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Subunit.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Antibody therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael CharyDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. mic9189@med.cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-1765
Alexander F BarbutoDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sudeh IzadmehrDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Marc TarsilloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Eduardo FleischerDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michele M BurnsDivision of Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCornell University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER THERAPYT32CA078207 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI James J Manfredi · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA078207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 emerged in December 2019 and led to the COVID-19 pandemic. Efforts to develop therapeutics have led to innovations such as mRNA vaccines and oral antivirals. Here we provide a narrative review of the biologic therapeutics used or proposed to treat COVID-19 during the last 3 years. This paper, along with its companion that covers xenobiotics and alternative remedies, is an update to our 2020 paper. Monoclonal antibodies prevent progression to severe disease, are not equally effective across variants, and are associated with minimal and self-limited reactions. Convalescent plasma has side effects like monoclonal antibodies, but with more infusion reactions and less efficacy. Vaccines prevent progression for a larger part of the population. DNA and mRNA vaccines are more effective than protein or inactivated virus vaccines. After mRNA vaccines, young men are more likely to have myocarditis in the subsequent 7 days. After DNA vaccines, those aged 30-50 are very slightly more likely to have thrombotic disease. To all vaccines we discuss, women are slightly more likely to have an anaphylactic reaction than men, but the absolute risk is small.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCOVID-19COVID-19 SerotherapyImmunotherapyVaccinesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, MonoclonalVaccinesCovid-19ImmunotherapyMonoclonal antibodiesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36862334
PMCPMC9979891
OpenAlexW4322758687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.