Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862301›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

Relationship between secondary health conditions and life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury: study across twenty-one countries.

Tomasz Tasiemski, Jolanta Kujawa, Piotr Tederko, Sara Rubinelli, James W Middleton, Ashley Craig, Marcel W M Post

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Tomasz TasiemskiDepartment of Adapted Physical Activity, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Poznań University of Physical Education, ul. Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, 61-871, Poznań, Poland. tasiemski@awf.poznan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3038-3578
Jolanta KujawaDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1309-2728
Piotr TederkoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-0357
Sara RubinelliDepartment of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne and Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-8914
James W MiddletonJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2777-8619
Ashley CraigJohn Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-7604
Marcel W M PostCenter of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2205-9404
The University of Sydney · AUMedical University of Lodz · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Lucerne · CHUniversity School of Physical Education in Kraków · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the relationships between impact of secondary health conditions (SHCs), treatment of SHCs, and life satisfaction (LS) following spinal cord injury (SCI) across 21 countries. Hypotheses were as follows: (1) Persons with SCI and fewer SHCs report higher LS and (2) Persons who receive treatment for SHCs report higher LS than those who do not receive treatment.

methodsCross-sectional survey, including 10,499 persons with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI aged 18 years or older and living in the community. To assess SHCs, 14 items adapted from the SCI-Secondary Conditions Scale were used (range 1-5). SHCs index was calculated as the mean of all 14 items. LS was assessed using a selection of 5 items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. LS index was calculated as the mean of these 5 items.

resultsSouth Korea, Germany, and Poland exhibited the highest (2.40-2.93) and Brazil, China, and Thailand the lowest (1.79-1.90) impact of SHCs. Indexes for LS and SHCs were inversely correlated (- 0.418; p < 0.001). Mixed Model Analysis showed that the fixed effect (key predictors of the study) of SHCs index (p < 0.001) and the positive interaction between SHCs index and treatment (p = 0.002) were significant determinants of LS.

conclusionPersons with SCI across the world are more likely to perceive better LS if they experience fewer SHCs and receive treatment for SHCs, in comparison to those who do not. Prevention and treatment of SHCs following SCI should be a high priority in order to improve the lived experience and enhance LS.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal Cord InjuriesBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPersonal SatisfactionInternationalityLife satisfactionSecondary health conditionsSpinal cord injuryTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36862301
PMCPMC10241701
OpenAlexW4322758951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.