Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862192›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2023

Long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from FREEDOM and its open-label extension.

Didier Hans, Michele McDermott, Shuang Huang, Min Kim, Enisa Shevroja, Michael McClung

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Didier HansInterdiciplinary Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Av. Pierre Decker 4, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. didier.hans@ascendys.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-5958
Michele McDermottAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7827-0778
Shuang HuangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Min KimAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Enisa ShevrojaInterdiciplinary Center of Bone Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Av. Pierre Decker 4, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-2948
Michael McClungOregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USUniversity of Lausanne · CHBone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab treatment significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score, independently of bone mineral density. Long-term denosumab treatment decreased the number of high fracture-risk patients and shifted more patients to lower fracture-risk categories. PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score (TBS

methodsPostmenopausal women with lumbar spine (LS) or total hip BMD T-score <-2.5 and ≥-4.0 who completed the FREEDOM DXA substudy and continued in OLE were included. Patients received either denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 3 years and same-dose open-label denosumab for 7 years (long-term denosumab; n=150) or placebo for 3 years and open-label denosumab for 7 years (crossover denosumab; n=129). BMD and TBS

resultsIn long-term denosumab group, continued increases from baseline to years 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 in BMD (11.6%, 13.7%, 15.5%, 18.5%, and 22.4%) and TBS

conclusionIn postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalBone DensityCancellous BoneDenosumabFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraePostmenopauseBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabBone mineral density (BMD)DenosumabOsteoporosisPostmenopausal womenSoft tissue thicknessTrabecular bone score (TBS)

Identifiers

PMID36862192
PMCPMC10202981
OpenAlexW4322758384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.