ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
24-Hour Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations Using a Contact Lens Sensor: Diagnostic Performance for Glaucoma Progression.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lung protective ventilation and intraocular pressure in Trendelenburg laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomised trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Intraocular pressure profiles between ipsilateral surgically and contralateral medically-controlled in primary open angle glaucoma patients.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Technologies for Continuous Intraocular Pressure Monitoring in the Control of Glaucoma Progression: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparing 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curve between newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Prediction of glaucoma progression by 24-h contact lens sensor profile in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advancements in Wearable and Implantable Intraocular Pressure Biosensors for Ophthalmology: A Comprehensive Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Recently Approved Drugs for Lowering and Controlling Intraocular Pressure to Reduce Vision Loss in Ocular Hypertensive and Glaucoma Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The impact of intraocular pressure fluctuations on the progression of glaucoma and associated factors.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) related fluctuations monitoring between 2 groups of visual field progression rates in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: Cross-sectional study performed at Bordeaux University Hospital. Twenty-four-hour monitoring was performed using a contact lens sensor (CLS; Triggerfish; SENSIMED, Etagnières, Switzerland). Progression rate was calculated using a linear regression of the mean deviation (MD) parameter of the visual field test (Octopus; HAAG-STREIT, Switzerland). Patients were allocated into two groups: group 1 with an MD progression rate <-0.5 dB/year and group 2 with an MD progression rate ≥-0.5 dB/year. An automatic signal-processing program was developed and a frequency filtering of the monitoring by wavelet transform analysis was used to compare the output signal between the two groups. A multivariate classifier was performed for prediction of the faster progression group. Results: Fifty-four eyes of 54 patients were included. The mean progression rate was -1.09 ± 0.60 dB/year in group 1 (n = 22) and -0.12 ± 0.13 dB/year in group 2 (n = 32). Twenty-four-hour magnitude and absolute area under the monitoring curve were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (group 1: 343.1 ± 62.3 millivolts [mVs] and 8.28 ± 2.10 mVs, respectively, group 2: 274.0 ± 75.0 mV and 6.82 ± 2.70 mVs respectively, P < 0.05). Magnitude and area under the wavelet curve for short frequency periods ranging from 60 to 220 minutes were also significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The 24-hour IOP related fluctuations characteristics, as assessed by a CLS, may act as a risk factor for progression in OAG. In association with other predictive factors of glaucoma progression, the CLS may help adjust treatment strategy earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.