Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36862082›Full record

ArticleRadiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc2023

Collaborative Privacy-preserving Approaches for Distributed Deep Learning Using Multi-Institutional Data.

Sharut Gupta, Sourav Kumar, Ken Chang, Charles Lu, Praveer Singh, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Role of Federated Learning Models in Medical Imaging.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharut Gupta *From the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-1848-9935
Sourav Kumar *From the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).
Ken ChangFrom the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).
Charles LuFrom the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).
Praveer SinghFrom the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).
Jayashree Kalpathy-CramerFrom the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 13th Street, Building 149, Room 2301, Charlestown, MA 02129 (S.G., S.K., K.C., C.L., P.S., J.K.C.); and Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India (S.G., S.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-8906-9618

Funding

Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
Quantitative Image Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR)U24CA180918 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FEDOROV, ANDRIY, KIKINIS, RON · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Informatics Tools for Optimized Imaging Biomarkers for Cancer Research&DiscoveryU24CA180927 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
Quantitative MRI of Glioblastoma ResponseU01CA154601 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE · 2011 to 2016
$3.4M
Distributed Learning of Deep Learning Models for Cancer ResearchU01CA242879 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KALPATHY-CRAMER, JAYASHREE, RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2021
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154601NCI NIH HHS U01 CA242879NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180918NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180927NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) algorithms have shown remarkable potential in automating various tasks in medical imaging and radiologic reporting. However, models trained on low quantities of data or only using data from a single institution often are not generalizable to other institutions, which may have different patient demographics or data acquisition characteristics. Therefore, training DL algorithms using data from multiple institutions is crucial to improving the robustness and generalizability of clinically useful DL models. In the context of medical data, simply pooling data from each institution to a central location to train a model poses several issues such as increased risk to patient privacy, increased costs for data storage and transfer, and regulatory challenges. These challenges of centrally hosting data have motivated the development of distributed machine learning techniques and frameworks for collaborative learning that facilitate the training of DL models without the need to explicitly share private medical data. The authors describe several popular methods for collaborative training and review the main considerations for deploying these models. They also highlight publicly available software frameworks for federated learning and showcase several real-world examples of collaborative learning. The authors conclude by discussing some key challenges and future research directions for distributed DL. They aim to introduce clinicians to the benefits, limitations, and risks of using distributed DL for the development of medical artificial intelligence algorithms.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPrivacyAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36862082
PMCPMC10091220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.