Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861661›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2023

An evaluation of adverse drug reactions and outcomes attributed to kratom in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from January 2004 through September 2021.

Xiaotong Li, Patrick Ndungu, Sanya B Taneja, Maryann R Chapin, Susan B Egbert, Krishi Akenapalli, Mary F Paine, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Richard D Boyce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Part 1: Evaluation of Pediatric Cannabis-Drug Interaction Reports.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Translating Kratom-Drug Interactions: From Bedside to Bench and Back.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaotong LiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrick NdunguSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sanya B TanejaIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-1617
Maryann R ChapinSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Susan B EgbertSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Krishi AkenapalliSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary F PaineCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-1839
Sandra L Kane-GillCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, Washington, USA.
Richard D BoyceSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-2085
University of Pittsburgh · USWashington State University Spokane · US

Funding

Pharmacology CoreU54AT008909 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAINE, MARY F · 2015 to 2024
$22.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kratom is a widely used Asian botanical that has gained popularity in the United States due to a perception that it can treat pain, anxiety, and opioid withdrawal symptoms. The American Kratom Association estimates 10-16 million people use kratom. Kratom-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) continue to be reported and raise concerns about the safety profile of kratom. However, studies are lacking that describe the overall pattern of kratom-associated adverse events and quantify the association between kratom and adverse events. ADRs reported to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from January 2004 through September 2021 were used to address these knowledge gaps. Descriptive analysis was conducted to analyze kratom-related adverse reactions. Conservative pharmacovigilance signals based on observed-to-expected ratios with shrinkage were estimated by comparing kratom to all other natural products and drugs. Based on 489 deduplicated kratom-related ADR reports, users were young (mean age 35.5 years), and more often male (67.5%) than female patients (23.5%). Cases were predominantly reported since 2018 (94.2%). Fifty-two disproportionate reporting signals in 17 system-organ-class categories were generated. The observed/reported number of kratom-related accidental death reports was 63-fold greater than expected. There were eight strong signals related to addiction or drug withdrawal. An excess proportion of ADR reports were about kratom-related drug complaints, toxicity to various agents, and seizures. Although further research is needed to assess the safety of kratom, clinicians and consumers should be aware that real-world evidence points to potential safety threats.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMitragynaAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMalePainUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID36861661
PMCPMC10264943
OpenAlexW4322757443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.