Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861510›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Role of EUS combined with a newly modified scoring system to detect pancreatic high-grade precancerous lesions.

Ryota Sagami, Kenji Hayasaka, Tetsuro Ujihara, Tomoyuki Iwaki, Yasushi Katsuyama, Hideaki Harada, Yusuke Ome, Goro Honda, Shin-Ichiro Horiguchi, Kazunari Murakami and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsyEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ryota SagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita San-ai Medical Center, Oita, Japan.
Kenji HayasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Tetsuro UjiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Tomoyuki IwakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Urawa Kyosai Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yasushi KatsuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Urawa Kyosai Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hideaki HaradaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Urawa Kyosai Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Yusuke OmeDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Goro HondaDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro HoriguchiDepartment of Pathology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Oita, Japan.
Yuji AmanoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Urawa Kyosai Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Kure Kyosai Hospital · JPNew Tokyo Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPOita Medical Center · JPOita University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objectives: Although pancreatic cancer (PC) has an extremely poor prognosis, the 5-year survival rate of patients with pancreatic high-grade precancerous lesion without invasive carcinoma (PHP) is favorable. PHP diagnosis and identification of patients requiring intervention are needed. We aimed to validate a modified PC detection scoring system regarding its detection ability for PHP and PC in the general population. Subjects and Methods: We modified an existing PC detection scoring system that incorporates low-grade risk (LGR) factors (family history, presence of diabetes mellitus [DM] or worsening DM, heavy drinking, smoking, stomach symptoms, weight loss, and pancreatic enzyme) and high-grade risk (HGR) factors (new-onset DM, familial PC, jaundice, tumor biomarkers, chronic pancreatitis, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, cysts, hereditary PC syndrome, and hereditary pancreatitis). Each factor was scored as one point; LGR score ≥3 points and/or HGR score ≥1 point (positive scores) were indicative of PC. The newly modified scoring system incorporated main pancreatic duct dilation as an HGR factor. The PHP diagnosis rate using this scoring system combined with EUS was prospectively analyzed. Results: Among 544 patients with positive scores, 10 had PHP. The diagnosis rates were 1.8% for PHP and 4.2% for invasive PC. Although the number of LGR and HGR factors tended to increase with PC progression, none of the individual factors were significantly different between patients with PHP and those without lesions. Conclusion: The newly modified scoring system evaluating multiple factors associated with PC could potentially identify patients with higher risk of PHP or PC.

Indexed as

EUSintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmpancreatic cancerpancreatic intraepithelial neoplasiascreening

Identifiers

PMID36861510
PMCPMC10134925
OpenAlexW4303512961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.