Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861507›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

EUS development in China: Results from national surveys in 2013 and 2020.

Lei Xin, Ye Gao, Tian-Jiao Wang, Qian-Qian Meng, Zhen-Dong Jin, Zeng-Jun Fu, Yi-Lin Wang, Han Lin, Zhao-Shen Li, Luo-Wei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsyEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lei XinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Ye GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Tian-Jiao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Qian-Qian MengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Zhen-Dong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Zeng-Jun FuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Yi-Lin WangGeorgetown Preparatory School, North Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Han LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Zhao-Shen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.
Luo-Wei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University; National Digestive Endoscopy Improvement System, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: EUS has recently gained attraction in mainland China. This study aimed to evaluate the development of EUS from results of two national surveys. Methods: EUS-related information, including infrastructure, personnel, volume, and quality indicator, was extracted from the Chinese Digestive Endoscopy Census. Data from 2012 and 2019 were compared, and differences among various hospitals and regions were analyzed. The EUS rates (EUS annual volume per 100,000 inhabitants) between China and developed countries were also compared. Results: The number of hospitals performing EUS in mainland China increased from 531 to 1236 (2.33-fold), and 4025 endoscopists performed EUS in 2019. The volumes of all EUS and interventional EUS increased from 207,166 to 464,182 (2.24-fold) and 10,737 to 15,334 (1.43-fold), respectively. The EUS rate in China was lower than that in developed countries but showed a higher growth rate. EUS rate varied substantially among different provincial regions (in 2019: 4.9-152.0 per 100,000 inhabitants) and showed significant positive association with gross domestic product per capita (in 2019: r = 0.559, P = 0.001). The EUS-FNA-positive rate in 2019 was comparable between hospitals in terms of annual volume (≥50 or < 50: 79.9% vs. 71.6%, P = 0.704) and practice duration (starting EUS-FNA before or after 2012: 78.7% vs. 72.6%, P = 0.565). Conclusion: EUS has developed considerably in China in recent years but still needs substantial improvement. More resources are in demand for hospitals in less-developed regions and with low EUS volume.

Indexed as

development statusEUSnational censusquality

Identifiers

PMID36861507
PMCPMC10134942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.