Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861505›Full record

ReviewEndoscopic ultrasound

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage for rescue treatment of malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Muhammad Aziz, Abdul Kouanda, Sun-Chuan Dai, Craig A Munroe and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06375967 (Multicenter Study of EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Choledochoduodenostomy as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Palliative Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06375967 nasuspendednot on this map

Multicenter Study of EUS-guided Gallbladder Drainage vs Choledochoduodenostomy as First Line in Malignant Distal Obstruction in Palliative Patients (CARPEGIEM Trial): an Open-label, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2024 to 2027Enrolled128ConditionsMalignant Biliary Obstruction, Biliary Tract Neoplasms, Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectableArmsEndoscopic biliary drainage, Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) and double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Role of Endoscopy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Endoscopic Management of Benign Gallbladder Diseases.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Full metal jacket: salvage of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Faisal KamalDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Muhammad Ali KhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wade Lee-SmithMulford Health Science Library, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Sachit SharmaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Ashu AcharyaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Umer FarooqDepartment of Medicine, Loyola Medicine MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn, IL, USA.
Muhammad AzizDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Abdul KouandaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sun-Chuan DaiDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Craig A MunroeDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mustafa ArainCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA.
Douglas G AdlerCenter for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ERCP is the first line of treatment for malignant biliary obstruction and EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is usually used for patients who have failed ERCP. EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has been suggested as a rescue treatment for patients who fail EUS-BD and ERCP. In this meta-analysis, we have evaluated the efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD as a rescue treatment of malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP and EUS-BD. We reviewed several databases from inception to August 27, 2021, to identify studies that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of EUS-GBD as a rescue treatment in the management of malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP and EUS-BD. Our outcomes of interest were clinical success, adverse events, technical success, stent dysfunction requiring intervention, and difference in mean pre- and postprocedure bilirubin. We calculated pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. We analyzed data using a random-effects model. We included five studies with 104 patients. Pooled rates (95% CI) of clinical success and adverse events were 85% (76%, 91%) and 13% (7%, 21%). Pooled rate (95% CI) for stent dysfunction requiring intervention was 9% (4%, 21%). The postprocedure mean bilirubin was significantly lower compared to preprocedure bilirubin, SMD (95% CI): -1.12 (-1.62--0.61). EUS-GBD is a safe and effective option to achieve biliary drainage after unsuccessful ERCP and EUS-BD in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

Indexed as

biliary obstructionEUSgall bladdermalignant biliary obstructionmetaanalysis

Identifiers

PMID36861505
PMCPMC10134926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.