Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861454›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Low-rank motion correction for accelerated free-breathing first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging.

Gastao Cruz, Alina Hua, Camila Munoz, Tevfik Fehmi Ismail, Amedeo Chiribiri, René Michael Botnar, Claudia Prieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance expert consensus statement on quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spatiotemporal Maps for Dynamic MRI Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gastao CruzSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-9104
Alina HuaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Camila MunozSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5278-4546
Tevfik Fehmi IsmailSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Amedeo ChiribiriSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
René Michael BotnarSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Claudia PrietoSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/20/13/34857British Heart Foundation RG/20/1/34802Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust NS/A000049/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDevelop a novel approach for accelerated 2D free-breathing myocardial perfusion via low-rank motion-corrected (LRMC) reconstructions.

methodsMyocardial perfusion imaging requires high spatial and temporal resolution, despite scan time constraints. Here, we incorporate LRMC models into the reconstruction-encoding operator, together with high-dimensionality patch-based regularization, to produce high quality, motion-corrected myocardial perfusion series from free-breathing acquisitions. The proposed framework estimates beat-to-beat nonrigid respiratory (and any other incidental) motion and the dynamic contrast subspace from the actual acquired data, which are then incorporated into the proposed LRMC reconstruction. LRMC was compared with iterative SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) (itSENSE) and low-rank plus sparse (LpS) reconstruction in 10 patients based on image-quality scoring and ranking by two clinical expert readers.

resultsLRMC achieved significantly improved results relative to itSENSE and LpS in terms of image sharpness, temporal coefficient of variation, and expert reader evaluation. Left ventricle image sharpness was approximately 75%, 79%, and 86% for itSENSE, LpS and LRMC, respectively, indicating improved image sharpness for the proposed approach. Corresponding temporal coefficient of variation results were 23%, 11% and 7%, demonstrating improved temporal fidelity of the perfusion signal with the proposed LRMC. Corresponding clinical expert reader scores (1-5, from poor to excellent image quality) were 3.3, 3.9 and 4.9, demonstrating improved image quality with the proposed LRMC, in agreement with the automated metrics.

conclusionLRMC produces motion-corrected myocardial perfusion in free-breathing acquisitions with substantially improved image quality when compared with iterative SENSE and LpS reconstructions.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLipopolysaccharidesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotionRespirationLipopolysaccharidesaccelerated scancardiac MRfree breathinglow rankmotion correctionmyocardial perfusion

Identifiers

PMID36861454
PMCPMC10952238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.