Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36861406›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

The Geriatric Prognostic Index: a clinical prediction model for survival of older diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with standard immunochemotherapy.

Kathrine T Isaksen, Renate Galleberg, Maria Adele Mastroianni, Marit Rinde, Leiv Sindre Rusten, Dlawer Barzenje, Frode Ramslien, Oystein Fluge, Marit Slaaen, Peter Meyer and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathrine T IsaksenDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Centre for B cell malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Renate GallebergDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen.
Maria Adele MastroianniDepartment of Hematology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog.
Marit RindeDepartment of Hematology, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg.
Leiv Sindre RustenDepartment of Surgery, Section of Oncology, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen.
Dlawer BarzenjeDepartment of Oncology, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes.
Frode RamslienDepartment of Hematology, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien.
Oystein FlugeDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen.
Marit SlaaenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; The Research Centre for Age Related Functional Decline and Diseases, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad.
Peter MeyerStavanger University Hospital-Rogaland, Stavanger.
Knut LiestolDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.
Erlend B SmelandDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Centre for B cell malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Ole Christian LingjardeDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.
Harald HolteKG Jebsen Centre for B cell malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.
Marianne BrodtkorbDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo. meide@ous-hf.no.
Oslo University Hospital · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOCancer Genetics (United States) · USDrammen Hospital · NOInnlandet Hospital Trust · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOSykehuset i Vestfold · NOTelemark Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International prognostic Index (IPI) is the most widely used clinical prediction model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP), but may be suboptimal in older patients. We aimed to develop and externally validate a clinical prediction model for older, RCHOP- treated DLBCL patients by examining geriatric assessment and lymphoma-related parameters in real-world cohorts. A population-based training set of 365 R-CHOP-treated DLBCL patients ≥70 years was identified through the Cancer Registry of Norway. The external test set consisted of a population-based cohort of 193 patients. Data on candidate predictors were retrieved from the Cancer Registry and through review of clinical records. Cox regression models for 2-year overall survival were used for model selection. Activities of daily living, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, age, sex, albumin, stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and lactate dehydrogenase level were identified as independent predictors and combined into a Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI). The GPI demonstrated good discrimination (optimismcorrected C-index 0.752), and identified low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups with significantly different survivals (2- year overall survival, 94%, 65%, and 25%, respectively). At external validation, the continuous and grouped GPI demonstrated good discrimination (C-index 0.727 and 0.710, respectively) and the GPI groups had significantly different survivals (2-year overall survival 95%, 65%, and 44%, respectively). Both the continuous and grouped GPI showed better discrimination than the IPI, revised-IPI and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-IPI (C-index 0.621, 0.583, and 0.670, respectively). In conclusion, we have developed and externally validated a GPI for older DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP that outperformed the IPI, revised-IPI and NCCN-IPI. A web-based calculator is available at https://wide.shinyapps. io/GPIcalculator/.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinHumansModels, StatisticalPrednisonePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRituximabVincristineCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID36861406
PMCPMC10483351
OpenAlexW4322757123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.