Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860931›Full record

ReviewAdolescent health, medicine and therapeutics2023

Practical Considerations for Using the Eating Disorder Examination Interview with Adolescents.

Megan N Parker, Jason M Lavender, Natasha A Schvey, Marian Tanofsky-Kraff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan N ParkerDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2511-199X
Jason M LavenderDepartment of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9853-2280
Natasha A SchveyDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-6713
Marian Tanofsky-KraffDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3871-2233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 35 years after its initial publication, the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) remains one of the most widely used semi-structured interviews for assessing eating disorder diagnoses and symptomatology. Although the interview provides certain advantages over other common measurement approaches (ie, questionnaires), there are particular considerations regarding the EDE that warrant attention, including in its use with adolescents. The aims of this paper are therefore to: 1) provide a brief overview of the interview itself, as well as a description of its origin and underlying conceptual framework; 2) describe relevant factors for administering the interview with adolescents; 3) review potential limitations regarding use of the EDE with adolescents; 4) address considerations for using the EDE with pertinent subpopulations of adolescents who may experience distinct eating disorder symptoms and/or risk factors; and 5) discuss the integration of self-report questionnaires with the EDE. Advantages of using the EDE include the ability for interviewers to clarify complex concepts and mitigate inattentive responding, enhanced orientation to the interview timeframe to improve recall, increased diagnostic accuracy compared to questionnaires, and accounting for potentially salient external factors (eg, food/eating rules imposed by a parent/guardian). Limitations include more extensive training requirements, greater assessment burden, variable psychometric performance across subgroups, lack of items evaluating muscularity-oriented symptoms and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder diagnostic criteria, and lack of explicit consideration for salient risk factors other than weight and shape concerns (eg, food insecurity).

Indexed as

assessmentdisordered eatingeating disordersmeasurementsemi-structuredyouth

Identifiers

PMID36860931
PMCPMC9969870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.