ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Ensemble deep learning models for protein secondary structure prediction using bidirectional temporal convolution and bidirectional long short-term memory.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning architectures achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction.Molecular diversity · 2026Review
- Integrating AI in security information and event management for real time cyber defense.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Computational Prediction of Secondary and Supersecondary Structures from Protein Sequences.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Research on information leakage in time series prediction based on empirical mode decomposition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of protein secondary structure by the improved TCN-BiLSTM-MHA model with knowledge distillation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein secondary structure prediction (PSSP) is a challenging task in computational biology. However, existing models with deep architectures are not sufficient and comprehensive for deep long-range feature extraction of long sequences. This paper proposes a novel deep learning model to improve Protein secondary structure prediction. In the model, our proposed bidirectional temporal convolutional network (BTCN) can extract the bidirectional deep local dependencies in protein sequences segmented by the sliding window technique, the bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) network can extract the global interactions between residues, and our proposed multi-scale bidirectional temporal convolutional network (MSBTCN) can further capture the bidirectional multi-scale long-range features of residues while preserving the hidden layer information more comprehensively. In particular, we also propose that fusing the features of 3-state and 8-state Protein secondary structure prediction can further improve the prediction accuracy. Moreover, we also propose and compare multiple novel deep models by combining bidirectional long short-term memory with temporal convolutional network (TCN), reverse temporal convolutional network (RTCN), multi-scale temporal convolutional network (multi-scale bidirectional temporal convolutional network), bidirectional temporal convolutional network and multi-scale bidirectional temporal convolutional network, respectively. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the reverse prediction of secondary structure outperforms the forward prediction, suggesting that amino acids at later positions have a greater impact on secondary structure recognition. Experimental results on benchmark datasets including CASP10, CASP11, CASP12, CASP13, CASP14, and CB513 show that our methods achieve better prediction performance compared to five state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.