Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860760›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2022

Cervical Cancer Screening Cascade for women living with HIV: a cohort study from Zimbabwe.

Katayoun Taghavi, Ardele Mandiriri, Tinei Shamu, Eliane Rohner, Lukas Bütikofer, Serra Asangbeh, Tsitsi Magure, Cleophas Chimbetete, Matthias Egger, Margaret Pascoe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Demographic and social determinants of human immunodeficiency virus status among women with cervical cancer in a low-resource setting.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Katayoun TaghaviInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ardele MandiririNewlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tinei ShamuInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eliane RohnerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lukas BütikoferCTU, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Serra AsangbehThe Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences of the University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Tsitsi MagureNewlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Cleophas ChimbeteteNewlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Matthias EggerInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Margaret PascoeNewlands Clinic, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Julia BohliusInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CH

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries with high HIV prevalence, predominantly in sub-Sahahran Africa, have the highest cervical cancer rates globally. HIV care cascades successfully facilitated the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy. A cascade approach could similarly succeed to scale-up cervical cancer screening, supporting WHO's goal to eliminate cervical cancer. We defined a Cervical Cancer Screening Cascade for women living with HIV (WLHIV), evaluating the continuum of cervical cancer screening integrated into an HIV clinic in Zimbabwe. We included WLHIV aged ≥18 years enrolled at Newlands Clinic in Harare from June 2012-2017 and followed them until June 2018. We used a cascade approach to evaluate the full continuum of secondary prevention from screening to treatment of pre-cancer and follow-up. We report percentages, median time to reach cascade stages, and cumulative incidence at two years with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used univariable Cox proportional hazard regressions to calculate cause-specific hazard ratios with 95% CIs for factors associated with completing the cascade stages. We included 1624 WLHIV in the study. The cumulative incidence of cervical screening was 85.4% (95% CI 83.5-87.1) at two years. Among the 396 WLHIV who received screen-positive tests in the study, the cumulative incidence of treatment after a positive screening test was 79.5% (95% CI 75.1-83.2) at two years. The cumulative incidence of testing negative at re-screening after treatment was 36.1% (95% CI 31.2-40.7) at two years. Using a cascade approach to evaluate the full continuum of cervical cancer screening, we found less-than 80% of WLHIV received treatment after screen-positive tests and less-than 40% were screen-negative at follow-up. Interventions to improve linkage to treatment for screen-positive WLHIV and studies to understand the clinical significance of screen-positive tests at follow-up among WLHIV are needed. These gaps in the continuum of care must be addressed in order to prevent cervical cancer.

Identifiers

PMID36860760
PMCPMC9974171
OpenAlexW4210716187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.