Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860555›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2023

Building a Covid-19 secure intensive care unit: A human-centred design approach.

Jody Ede, David Garry, Graham Barker, Owen Gustafson, Elizabeth King, Hannah Routley, Christopher Biggs, Cherry Lumley, Lyn Bennett, Stephanie Payne and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jody EdeOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7289-6991
David GarryOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Graham BarkerOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Owen GustafsonOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-3696
Elizabeth KingOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-7004
Hannah RoutleyOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Christopher BiggsNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Cherry LumleyOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Lyn BennettOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Stephanie PayneOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Andrew EllisOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Clinton GreenOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Nathan SmithOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Laura VincentOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Matthew HoldawayOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Peter WatkinsonOxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted weaknesses in the National Health Service critical care provision including both capacity and infrastructure. Traditionally, healthcare workspaces have failed to fully incorporate Human-Centred Design principles resulting in environments that negatively affect the efficacy of task completion, patient safety and staff wellbeing. In the summer of 2020, we received funds for the urgent construction of a Covid-19 secure critical care facility. The aim of this project was to design a pandemic resilient facility centred around both staff and patient requirements and safety, within the available footprint. Methods: We developed a simulation exercise, underpinned by Human-Centred Design principles, to evaluate intensive care designs through Build Mapping, Tasks Analysis and Qualitative data. Build Mapping involved taping out sections of the design and mocking up with equipment. Task Analysis and qualitative data were collected following task completion. Results: 56 participants completed the build simulation exercise generating 141 design suggestions (69 task related, 56 patient and relative related, 16 staff related). Suggestions translated to 18 multilevel design improvements; five significant structural changes (Macro level) including wall moves and lift size change. Minor improvements were made at a Meso and Micro design level. Critical care design drivers identified included functional drivers (visibility, Covid-19 secure environment, workflow, and task efficiency) and behavioural drivers (learning and development, light, humanising intensive care and design consistency). Conclusion: Success of clinical tasks, infection control, patient safety and staff/patient wellbeing are highly dependent on clinical environments. Primarily, we have improved clinical design by focusing on user requirements. Secondly, we developed a replicable approach to exploring healthcare build plans revealing significant design changes, that may have only been identified once built.

Indexed as

Human-centred designhuman factorsintensive care unitsimulation

Identifiers

PMID36860555
PMCPMC9204129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.