Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860553›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2023

Albumin versus balanced crystalloid for resuscitation in the treatment of sepsis: A protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study, "ABC-Sepsis".

John Cafferkey, Andrew Ferguson, Julia Grahamslaw, Katherine Oatey, John Norrie, Nazir Lone, Timothy Walsh, Daniel Horner, Andy Appelboam, Peter Hall and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

John CafferkeyEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6926-9508
Andrew FergusonEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julia GrahamslawEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Katherine OateyEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
John NorrieDepartment of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nazir LoneDepartment of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-2779
Timothy WalshDepartment of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Daniel HornerEmergency Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Andy AppelboamAcademic Department of Emergency Medicine Exeter (ACADEMEx), Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter Devon.
Peter HallEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard SkipworthDepartment of Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Derek BellDepartment of Acute Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, London.
Kevin RooneyRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley.
Manu Shankar-HariThe Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh BioQuarter, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Alasdair CorfieldEmergency Department, Royal Alexandra Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
Alasdair GrayEmergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh (EMERGE), Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1460-8327

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients presenting with suspected sepsis to secondary care often require fluid resuscitation to correct hypovolaemia and/or septic shock. Existing evidence signals, but does not demonstrate, a benefit for regimes including albumin over balanced crystalloid alone. However, interventions may be started too late, missing a critical resuscitation window. Methods: ABC Sepsis is a currently recruiting randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing 5% human albumin solution (HAS) with balanced crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in patients with suspected sepsis. This multicentre trial is recruiting adult patients within 12 hours of presentation to secondary care with suspected community acquired sepsis, with a National Early Warning Score ≥5, who require intravenous fluid resuscitation. Participants are randomised to 5% HAS or balanced crystalloid as the sole resuscitation fluid for the first 6 hours. Objectives: Primary objectives are feasibility of recruitment to the study and 30-day mortality between groups. Secondary objectives include in-hospital and 90-day mortality, adherence to trial protocol, quality of life measurement and secondary care costs. Discussion: This trial aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial to address the current uncertainty around optimal fluid resuscitation of patients with suspected sepsis. Understanding the feasibility of delivering a definitive study will be dependent on how the study team are able to negotiate clinician choice, Emergency Department pressures and participant acceptability, as well as whether any clinical signal of benefit is detected.

Indexed as

albumin/HAScrystalloidemergency department/medicinefeasibilityfluidprotocolresuscitationSepsis

Identifiers

PMID36860553
PMCPMC9157259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.