ArticleIEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology2022
Robust Image Population Based Stain Color Normalization: How Many Reference Slides Are Enough?
Article in IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ViT-Stain: Vision transformer-driven virtual staining for skin histopathology via global contextual learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- Informatics at the Frontier of Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Optimized Whole-Slide-Image H&E Stain Normalization: A Step Towards Big Data Integration in Digital Pathology.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histopathologic evaluation of Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stained slides is essential for disease diagnosis, revealing tissue morphology, structure, and cellular composition. Variations in staining protocols and equipment result in images with color nonconformity. Although pathologists compensate for color variations, these disparities introduce inaccuracies in computational whole slide image (WSI) analysis, accentuating data domain shift and degrading generalization. Current state-of-the-art normalization methods employ a single WSI as reference, but selecting a single WSI representative of a complete WSI-cohort is infeasible, inadvertently introducing normalization bias. We seek the optimal number of slides to construct a more representative reference based on composite/aggregate of multiple H&E density histograms and stain-vectors, obtained from a randomly selected WSI population (WSI-Cohort-Subset). We utilized 1,864 IvyGAP WSIs as a WSI-cohort, and built 200 WSI-Cohort-Subsets varying in size (from 1 to 200 WSI-pairs) using randomly selected WSIs. The WSI-pairs' mean Wasserstein Distances and WSI-Cohort-Subsets' standard deviations were calculated. The Pareto Principle defined the optimal WSI-Cohort-Subset size. The WSI-cohort underwent structure-preserving color normalization using the optimal WSI-Cohort-Subset histogram and stain-vector aggregates. Numerous normalization permutations support WSI-Cohort-Subset aggregates as representative of a WSI-cohort through WSI-cohort CIELAB color space swift convergence, as a result of the law of large numbers and shown as a power law distribution. We show normalization at the optimal (Pareto Principle) WSI-Cohort-Subset size and corresponding CIELAB convergence: a) Quantitatively, using 500 WSI-cohorts; b) Quantitatively, using 8,100 WSI-regions; c) Qualitatively, using 30 cellular tumor normalization permutations. Aggregate-based stain normalization may contribute in increasing computational pathology robustness, reproducibility, and integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.