Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860430›Full record

ArticleAquaculture nutrition2022

Effects of Chitosan-Coated Microdiet on Dietary Physical Properties, Growth Performance, Digestive Enzyme Activities, Antioxidant Capacity, and Inflammation Response of Large Yellow Croaker (

Jiahui Liu, Wenxuan Xu, Yongtao Liu, Yuntao Wang, Jianmin Zhang, Zhen Wang, Kangsen Mai, Qinghui Ai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aquaculture nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiahui LiuKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Wenxuan XuKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Yongtao LiuKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Yuntao WangKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Jianmin ZhangKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Zhen WangKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Kangsen MaiKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Qinghui AiKey Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-474X
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 30-day feeding trial was designed to investigate the physical properties of chitosan-coated microdiet (CCD) and the effect of CCD on survival, growth performance, activities of digestive enzymes, intestinal development, antioxidant capacity, and inflammatory response of large yellow croaker larvae (initial weight: 3.81 ± 0.20 mg). Four isonitrogenous (50% crude protein) and isolipidic (20% crude lipid) microdiets were prepared with different concentrations of chitosan wall material by spray drying method (0.00%, 0.30%, 0.60%, and 0.90%, weight (chitosan) : volume (acetic acid)). Results showed that the lipid encapsulation efficiency (control: 60.52%, Diet1: 84.63%, Diet2: 88.06%, Diet3: 88.65%) and nitrogen retention efficiency (control: 63.76%, Diet1: 76.14%, Diet2: 79.52%, Diet3: 84.68%) correlated positively with the concentration of wall material (

Identifiers

PMID36860430
PMCPMC9973130
OpenAlexW4294877932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.