ArticleData in brief2023
Datasets for a multidimensional analysis connecting clean energy access and social development in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article we present datasets used for the construction of a composite indicator, the Social Clean Energy Access (Social CEA) Index, presented in detail in [1]. This article consists of comprehensive social development data related to electricity access, collected from several sources, and processed according to the methodology described in [1]. The new composite index includs 24 indicators capturing the status of the social dimensions related to electricity access for 35 SSA countries. The development of the Social CEA Index was supported by an extensive review of the literature about electricity access and social development which led to the selection of its indicators. The structure was evaluated for its soundness using correlational assessments and principal component analyses. The raw data provided allow stakeholders to focus on specific country indicators and to observe how scores on these indicators contributed to a country overall rank. The Social CEA Index also allows to understand the number of best performing countries (out of a total of 35) for each indicator. This allows different stakeholders to identify which the weakest dimensions are of social development and thus help in addressing priorities for action for funding towards specific electrification projects. The data can be used to assign weights according to stakeholders' specific requirements. Finally, the dataset can be used for the case of Ghana to monitor the Social CEA Index progress over time through a dimension's breakdown approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.