ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023
Short-term outcome prediction for myasthenia gravis: an explainable machine learning model.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal omics reveals immune repertoire remodeling in myasthenia gravis patients post-tacrolimus therapy.Genes and immunity · 2026Article
- Dynamic Ensemble Selection for Early Detection of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Fracture Patients.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Predictors of exacerbation in myasthenia gravis after minimal symptom expression: a bicenter cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A neuromuscular clinician's primer on machine learning.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models and AI-Assisted Clinical Assessments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Myasthenia gravis in 2025: five new things and four hopes for the future.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Constructing and Validating a Nomogram Model for Short-Term Prognosis of Patients with AChR-Ab+ GMG.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
- Clinical features and genetic spectrum of a multicenter Chinese cohort with myotonic dystrophy type 1.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning models for predicting short-term prognosis in AChR-Ab+ generalized myasthenia gravis using clinical features and systemic inflammation index.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Machine learning strategy for identifying altered gut microbiomes for diagnostic screening in myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatigability. The fluctuating nature of the disease course impedes the clinical management. Objective: The purpose of the study was to establish and validate a machine learning (ML)-based model for predicting the short-term clinical outcome in MG patients with different antibody types. Methods: We studied 890 MG patients who had regular follow-ups at 11 tertiary centers in China from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2021 (653 patients for derivation and 237 for validation). The short-term outcome was the modified post-intervention status (PIS) at a 6-month visit. A two-step variable screening was used to determine the factors for model construction and 14 ML algorithms were used for model optimisation. Results: The derivation cohort included 653 patients from Huashan hospital [age 44.24 (17.22) years, female 57.6%, generalized MG 73.5%], and the validation cohort included 237 patients from 10 independent centers [age 44.24 (17.22) years, female 55.0%, generalized MG 81.2%]. The ML model identified patients who were improved with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 [0.89-0.93], 'Unchanged' 0.89 [0.87-0.91], and 'Worse' 0.89 [0.85-0.92] in the derivation cohort, whereas identified patients who were improved with an AUC of 0.84 [0.79-0.89], 'Unchanged' 0.74 [0.67-0.82], and 'Worse' 0.79 [0.70-0.88] in the validation cohort. Both datasets presented a good calibration ability by fitting the expectation slopes. The model is finally explained by 25 simple predictors and transferred to a feasible web tool for an initial assessment. Conclusion: The explainable, ML-based predictive model can aid in forecasting the short-term outcome for MG with good accuracy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.