Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36860229›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Outcomes of Preprocedural Pulmonary Hypertension on All-Cause and Cardiac Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review.

Aditya Desai, Darshi M Desai, Aneeque Jamil, Denise Csendes, Sai Dheeraj Gutlapalli, Keerthana Prakash, Kiran Maee Swarnakari, Meena Bai, Mohana Priya Manoharan, Rabab Raja and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aditya DesaiInternal Medicine Clinical Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Darshi M DesaiInternal Medicine Clinical Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Aneeque JamilInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Denise CsendesInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sai Dheeraj GutlapalliInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Keerthana PrakashInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Kiran Maee SwarnakariInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Meena BaiMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mohana Priya ManoharanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Rabab RajaMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Safeera KhanInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
University of California, Riverside · USCalifornia Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) commonly have an associated finding of pulmonary hypertension (PH), and it has been previously shown to have increased morbidity and mortality following surgical aortic valve repair (SAVR) as well as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). There are no guidelines stating the cut-off point for PH at which the patient can safely undergo TAVI with benefits outweighing the risks. This is partly due to the lack of uniformity in the PH definition used in various studies. This systematic review sought to study the effect of preprocedural pulmonary hypertension on early and late all-cause and cardiac mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. We performed a systematic review of studies comparing patients with AS undergoing TAVI having PH. The review was undertaken as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were identified from PubMed, Pubmed Central (PMC), Cochrane, and Medline on January 10, 2022, for literature published until January 10, 2022. MeSH strategy was used on PubMed to search the literature, and filters were applied to search only Observational Studies, randomized controlled trials (RCT), and meta-analysis. A total of 170 unique articles were identified and screened. Of the 33 full-text articles that were reviewed, 18 articles, including duplicates, were excluded. Fifteen articles fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. The study design included two meta-analyses, one randomized control trial, one prospective cohort study, and 11 retrospective cohort studies. The studies involved a total of approximately 30,000 patients. The observational studies in our review were of good to fair quality, the RCT had a low to moderate bias, and the meta-analysis was of moderate quality. Baseline PH and persistence of PH post-TAVI are strongly associated with all-cause and cardiac mortality. Few studies have shown that a decrease in post-TAVI PH carries mortality benefits. Therefore, efforts should be made to identify mechanisms of persistent PH post-TAVI and whether interventions to reduce PH pre-TAVI will have any clinical implications or not by conducting RCT.

Indexed as

critical aortic stenosismorbidity and mortalitypulmonary artery systolic pressurepulmonary hypertensiontrans-catheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID36860229
PMCPMC9969809
OpenAlexW4318406498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.