Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859732›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Dermoscopy of nonneoplastic diseases in dark skin].

Christoph Müller, Harald Kittler

Full text readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christoph MüllerUniversitätsklinikum für Dermatologie, AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich. christoph.mueller@meduniwien.ac.at.
Harald KittlerUniversitätsklinikum für Dermatologie, AKH Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermoscopy is an important tool in general dermatology.

objectivesTo show differences of light and dark skin in nonneoplastic diseases with focus on dermoscopy. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing previously published studies, dermoscopic differences of various skin types as well as features of inflammatory diseases and pigmentary changes are illustrated.

resultsCertain structures are more difficult to assess in dermoscopy of dark skin (e.g., vessels), while other structures (e.g., follicular openings) are more prominent.

conclusionsThe majority of studies on dermoscopy are from studies that predominantly included individuals with fair skin types. Further studies of individuals with skin type IV or higher are needed to improve diagnosis in these patients.

Indexed as

HypopigmentationPigmentation DisordersSkin NeoplasmsDermoscopyHumansSkinDermoscopic characteristicsInfectious skin diseasesNonneoplastic diseasesPigmentation disordersSkin type

Identifiers

PMID36859732
PMCPMC10049959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.