Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859696›Full record

ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2023

An efficient environmental DNA detection method for rare species: a case study of a small salamander (Hynobius boulengeri).

Masayuki K Sakata, Daiki Takeshita, Ryohei Nishizawa, Takuya Sato, Toshifumi Minamoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masayuki K SakataResearch Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Kita-9, Nishi-9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8589, Japan. masa2k_mskk1518@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-854X
Daiki TakeshitaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11, Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 657-8501, Japan.
Ryohei NishizawaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11, Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 657-8501, Japan.
Takuya SatoCenter for Ecological Research, Kyoto University, 2-509-3, Hirano, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2113, Japan.
Toshifumi MinamotoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, 3-11, Tsurukabuto, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 657-8501, Japan.

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 17H03735Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 20H03326Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 22K15183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of biodiversity is a serious concern, and amphibians are particularly threatened. Most small salamanders in Japan are endangered. Distributional information is fundamental to the conservation of these rare species; however, small salamanders are generally difficult to locate or catch. Environmental DNA analysis is an effective survey method for monitoring such rare species. The conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, which combines PCR amplification with subsequent electrophoresis, and the real-time PCR method, which uses fluorescent material, are commonly used for this purpose. In this study, a comparison of these two detection methods was conducted using a rare salamander species, Hynobius boulengeri, as a model case. We compared three points: (i) detection sensitivity, (ii) influence of environmental factors related to detection, and (iii) time and financial costs of the two methods. To perform this comparison, we developed a real-time PCR detection assay, conducted field surveys, and compared the time and financial costs of conventional and real-time PCR methods. The comparison showed no statistical difference in the detection sensitivity from field samples, and the effects of environmental factors tended to be similar. In addition, the financial cost was lower for the conventional PCR method while the time cost was lower for the real-time PCR method. Therefore, selecting eDNA detection methods based on objectives, time, and financial costs will promote efficient monitoring and contribute to the conservation of rare species.

Indexed as

CaudataDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringJapanReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, EnvironmentalAmphibiaConservationEnvironmental DNA (eDNA)MonitoringPCRSmall salamander

Identifiers

PMID36859696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.