Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859681›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2024

Complications and outcomes following injection of foreign material into the male external genitalia for augmentation: a single-centre experience and systematic review.

Karl H Pang, Karen Randhawa, Stanley Tang, Giuseppe Fallara, Athos Katelaris, Fabio Castiglione, Kamran Ahmed, Gideon Blecher, Nim Christopher, David J Ralph and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Complications and management of penile enhancement procedures.Translational andrology and urology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karl H PangDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-2319
Karen RandhawaDepartment of Urology, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Ireland, UK.
Stanley TangDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Giuseppe FallaraDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Athos KatelarisDepartment of Urology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fabio CastiglioneDepartment of Urology, King's College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kamran AhmedDepartment of Urology, King's College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gideon BlecherDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nim ChristopherDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David J RalphDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-1182
Asif MuneerDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-1614
Hussain M AlnajjarDepartment of Urology and Institute of Andrology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Hussain.alnajjar@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injection of exogenous material into the penis and scrotum has been performed for augmentation purposes. Complications include cosmetic dissatisfaction, penile necrosis and lymphoedema. We report the complications and outcomes from a single centre with an updated systematic review of the literature. A retrospective review of all cases presenting with foreign substance injection into the genitalia, over a 10-year period was performed. Thirty-five patients with a mean (standard deviation (SD); range) age of 36.9 (±9.1; 22-61) years at presentation were included. The mean (SD; range) time between injection and presentation was 7.8 (±5.8; 1 day-20 years) years. The most common injected substance was silicone (n = 16, 45.7%) and liquid paraffin (n = 8, 22.9%). The penile shaft (94.3%) was the most injected site. The most common presentations were cosmetic dissatisfaction (57.1%) and pain and/or swelling (45.7%). Surgery was required in 32 (91.4%) cases. Primary procedures included local excision and primary closure (n = 19, 59.4%), circumcision (n = 5, 15.6%), excision with a split skin graft or a scrotal flap reconstruction (n = 5, 15.6%). Three (8.6%) patients presented with necrosis and required acute debridement. Overall, 18 patients had more than 1 procedure, and 8 patients required 3 or more procedures. A systematic search of the literature identified 887 articles of which 68 studies were included for analysis. The most common substance injected was paraffin (47.7%), followed by silicone (15.8%). The majority of patients (77.9%) presented with pain, swelling or penile deformity. 78.8% of the patients underwent surgical treatment, which included excision and primary closure with or without the use of skin grafts (85.1% of all procedures), the use of flaps (12.3%) and penile amputation (n = 2). Complications of foreign body injection into the male genitalia can be serious resulting in necrosis and autoamputation. Surgical intervention is often required to excise abnormal tissue to manage pain and improve cosmesis.

Indexed as

PenisAdultForeign BodiesHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedParaffinPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesScrotumSiliconesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultParaffinSilicones

Identifiers

PMID36859681
PMCPMC11251987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.