SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2024
Complications and outcomes following injection of foreign material into the male external genitalia for augmentation: a single-centre experience and systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Scrotal Flaps for Penile Skin Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Subcutaneous penile silicone sleeve implants for penile augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Managing residual volumes in penile girth enhancement with hyaluronic acid fillers: a case series and literature review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Penile self-augmentation with Vaseline injection.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- [Painful, cicatricial inflammation of the penile shaft-paraffinoma].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Commentary on: Use of Himplant® for correction of residual deformity following prior treatment of Peyronie's disease: a case report.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Complications of penile augmentation: A narrative review of injectables, implants, and surgical grafts.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Penile shaft reconstruction after cream self-injection: a case report.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Complications and management of penile enhancement procedures.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- A Case of Kanamycin Self-Injection for Penile Augmentation and a Literature Review of Penile Foreign Body Injections.Cureus · 2024Article
- Two-Stage Penile Reconstruction after Paraffin Injection: A Case Report and a Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injection of exogenous material into the penis and scrotum has been performed for augmentation purposes. Complications include cosmetic dissatisfaction, penile necrosis and lymphoedema. We report the complications and outcomes from a single centre with an updated systematic review of the literature. A retrospective review of all cases presenting with foreign substance injection into the genitalia, over a 10-year period was performed. Thirty-five patients with a mean (standard deviation (SD); range) age of 36.9 (±9.1; 22-61) years at presentation were included. The mean (SD; range) time between injection and presentation was 7.8 (±5.8; 1 day-20 years) years. The most common injected substance was silicone (n = 16, 45.7%) and liquid paraffin (n = 8, 22.9%). The penile shaft (94.3%) was the most injected site. The most common presentations were cosmetic dissatisfaction (57.1%) and pain and/or swelling (45.7%). Surgery was required in 32 (91.4%) cases. Primary procedures included local excision and primary closure (n = 19, 59.4%), circumcision (n = 5, 15.6%), excision with a split skin graft or a scrotal flap reconstruction (n = 5, 15.6%). Three (8.6%) patients presented with necrosis and required acute debridement. Overall, 18 patients had more than 1 procedure, and 8 patients required 3 or more procedures. A systematic search of the literature identified 887 articles of which 68 studies were included for analysis. The most common substance injected was paraffin (47.7%), followed by silicone (15.8%). The majority of patients (77.9%) presented with pain, swelling or penile deformity. 78.8% of the patients underwent surgical treatment, which included excision and primary closure with or without the use of skin grafts (85.1% of all procedures), the use of flaps (12.3%) and penile amputation (n = 2). Complications of foreign body injection into the male genitalia can be serious resulting in necrosis and autoamputation. Surgical intervention is often required to excise abnormal tissue to manage pain and improve cosmesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.