Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859615›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2023

A flow cytometry-based protocol for syngenic isolation of neurovascular unit cells from mouse and human tissues.

Daniel Spitzer, Maryam I Khel, Tim Pütz, Jenny Zinke, Xiaoxiong Jia, Kathleen Sommer, Katharina Filipski, Frits Thorsen, Thomas M Freiman, Stefan Günther and 7 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insights gained from single-cell sequencing analysis of ischemic stroke.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advancements in the Application of scRNA-Seq in Breast Research: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniel SpitzerDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-4588
Maryam I KhelEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tim PützDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jenny ZinkeEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Xiaoxiong JiaEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kathleen SommerEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katharina FilipskiEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frits ThorsenThe Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Thomas M FreimanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Stefan GüntherMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Karl H PlateEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Patrick N HarterEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Stefan LiebnerEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4656-2258
Yvonne ReissEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Mariangela Di TacchioEdinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sylvaine Guérit *Edinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kavi Devraj *Edinger Institute (Institute of Neurology), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Kavi.Devraj@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5005-3413
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEMax Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research · DEUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neurovascular unit (NVU), composed of endothelial cells, pericytes, juxtaposed astrocytes and microglia together with neurons, is essential for proper central nervous system functioning. The NVU critically regulates blood-brain barrier (BBB) function, which is impaired in several neurological diseases and is therefore a key therapeutic target. To understand the extent and cellular source of BBB dysfunction, simultaneous isolation and analysis of NVU cells is needed. Here, we describe a protocol for the EPAM-ia method, which is based on flow cytometry for simultaneous isolation and analysis of endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes and microglia. This method is based on differential processing of NVU cell types using enzymes, mechanical homogenization and filtration specific for each cell type followed by combining them for immunostaining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The gating strategy encompasses cell-type-specific and exclusion markers for contaminating cells to isolate the major NVU cell types. This protocol takes ~6 h for two sets of one or two animals. The isolation part requires experience in animal handling, fresh tissue processing and immunolabeling for flow cytometry. Sorted NVU cells can be used for downstream applications including transcriptomics, proteomics and cell culture. Multiple cell-type analyses using UpSet can then be applied to obtain robust targets from single or multiple NVU cell types in neurological diseases associated with BBB dysfunction. The EPAM-ia method is also amenable to isolation of several other cell types, including cancer cells and immune cells. This protocol is applicable to healthy and pathological tissue from mouse and human sources and to several cell types compared with similar protocols.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsAnimalsAstrocytesFlow CytometryHumansMiceNeurons

Identifiers

PMID36859615
OpenAlexW4322738959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.