Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859595›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2023

Coronary computed tomography angiography imaging features combined with computed tomography-fractional flow reserve, pericoronary fat attenuation index, and radiomics for the prediction of myocardial ischemia.

Jie Hou, Guangying Zheng, Lu Han, Zhenyu Shu, Haochu Wang, Zhongyu Yuan, Jiaxuan Peng, Xiangyang Gong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jie Hou *Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Guangying Zheng *Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Lu HanJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Zhenyu ShuHeart Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Address: No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hanghzou City, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China.
Haochu WangHeart Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Address: No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hanghzou City, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China.
Zhongyu YuanJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Jiaxuan PengJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning Province, China.
Xiangyang GongHeart Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Address: No. 158 Shangtang Road, Hanghzou City, 310014, Zhejiang Province, China. cjr.gxy@hotmail.com.
Jinzhou Medical University · CNHangzhou Medical College · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to predict myocardial ischemia (MIS) by constructing models with imaging features, CT-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), pericoronary fat attenuation index (pFAI), and radiomics based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS AND

resultsThis study included 96 patients who underwent CCTA and single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). According to SPECT-MPI results, there were 72 vessels with MIS in corresponding supply area and 105 vessels with no-MIS. The conventional model [lesion length (LL), MDS (maximum stenosis diameter × 100% / reference vessel diameter), MAS (maximum stenosis area × 100% / reference vessel area) and CT value], radiomics model (radiomics features), and multi-faceted model (all features) were constructed using support vector machine. Conventional and radiomics models showed similar predictive efficacy [AUC: 0.76, CI 0.62-0.90 vs. 0.74, CI 0.61-0.88; p > 0.05]. Adding pFAI to the conventional model showed better predictive efficacy than adding CT-FFR (AUC: 0.88, CI 0.79-0.97 vs. 0.80, CI 0.68-0.92; p < 0.05). Compared with conventional and radiomics model, the multi-faceted model showed the highest predictive efficacy (AUC: 0.92, CI 0.82-0.98, p < 0.05).

conclusionpFAI is more effective for predicting MIS than CT-FFR. A multi-faceted model combining imaging features, CT-FFR, pFAI, and radiomics is a potential diagnostic tool for MIS.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialMyocardial IschemiaComputed Tomography AngiographyConstriction, PathologicCoronary AngiographyHumansPredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness IndexTomography, X-Ray ComputedCT-fractional flow reservemachine learningmyocardial ischemiapericoronary fat attenuation indexpredictionradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36859595
OpenAlexW4322722563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.