Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859511›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The role of defense styles and psychopathological symptoms on adherence to conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Francesca Gioia, Chiara Imperato, Valentina Boursier, Christian Franceschini, Adriano Schimmenti, Alessandro Musetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca GioiaDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Chiara ImperatoDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Valentina BoursierDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Christian FranceschiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Adriano Schimmenti *Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, UKE-Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.
Alessandro Musetti *Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. alessandro.musetti@unipr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the unpredictability of the COVID-19 pandemic situation, individuals felt uncertain and insecure. As a consequence, conspiracy theories flourished and quickly spread. In the current study, we examine the relationship between general and COVID-19-related conspiracy theories, cognitive reflection, psychopathological symptoms, and defense styles in a sample of Italian adults. A total of 450 participants (50.2% male; mean age = 40.89 years, SD = 12.15) took part in an online survey. Two linear regression models on the general (explained variance 22.6%) and COVID-19-related (explained variance 33.0%) conspiracy theories have been tested. Among the predictive factors, older age, mania symptoms, and immature defenses facilitate adherence to conspiracy theories; on the opposite side, higher education, cognitive reflection, and mature defenses protected from adherence to conspiracy theories. The study provides some novel findings about factors that are significantly associated with general and COVID-19-related conspiracy theories, and highlights the pivotal role of individuals' psychological defenses in conspiracy theories.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID36859511
PMCPMC9976667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.