ArticleJournal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2023
Guidance and rationale for the immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar.
Article in Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The influence of implant placement depth on peri-implant tissues in immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Trial
- Immediate dental implants: insights into early and late failures from a large-scale Chinese cohort.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Comparing the biological response to immediate versus delayed implants placement in terms of osseointegration and bone quality.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Expanded classification for immediate molar implant placement: Integrating root socket strategies beyond septal bone typing.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Clinical study of dynamic navigation-assisted immediate implant placement in posterior maxillary alveolar bone defects.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- A short-term clinical evaluation of immediate implant placement in periodontitis patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Assessment of Posterior Maxillary Alveolar Bone for Immediate Implant Placement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2024Article
- Long-term survival rates of tapered self-tapping bone-level implants after immediate placement: a positional effective rationale.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023Review
- Attitudes of Oral Surgeons and Periodontists towards Immediate Dental Implant Placement.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: While the reliability of immediate implant placement in the maxillary molar has been discussed, its significance is questionable. There have been no guidelines for case selection and surgical technique for successful treatment outcomes of immediate maxillary molar implants. Therefore, in this study, we classified alveolar bone height and socket morphology of the maxillary molar to establish guidelines for immediate implant placement. Materials and Methods: From 2011 to 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 106 patients with 148 immediate implants at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and patient characteristics and treatment results were evaluated clinically and radiologically. Results: A total of 29 tapered, sand-blasted, large-grit, and acid-etched (SLA) surfaces of implants were placed in 26 patients. The mean patient age was 64.88 years. Two implants failed and were reinstalled, resulting in a 93.10% survival rate. Fluctuating marginal bone level changes indicating bone regeneration and bone loss were observed in the first year following installation and remained stable after one year of prosthesis loading, with an average bone loss of 0.01±0.01 mm on the distal side and 0.03±0.03 mm on the mesial side. Conclusion: This clinical study demonstrated the significance of immediate implant placement in maxillary molars as a reliable treatment with a high survival rate using tapered SLA implants. With an accurate approach to immediate implantation, surgical intervention and treatment time can be reduced, resulting in patient satisfaction and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.