Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36859316›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

The efficacy of nalmefene on anesthetic recovery of patients: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Xiaowen Ma, Jueying Liu, Ying Tang, Qiueyue Lian, Xiaorong Huai, Wanfeng Liu, Diansan Su

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04713358 (Effect of Nalmefene on the Quality of Resuscitation in Patients Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04713358 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Nalmefene on the Quality of Resuscitation in Patients Under General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorRenJi HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled542ConditionsResuscitationArmsNalmefene, normal Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaowen Ma *Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jueying Liu *Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying TangDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qiueyue LianDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaorong HuaiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wanfeng LiuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. liuwanfeng@renji.com.
Diansan SuDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Jiaotong, Renji Hospital, University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. diansansu@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-1025
Renji Hospital · CN

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Support 20191903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSo far, the recovery quality after general anesthesia is still unsatisfied. Nalmefene is a drug to treat opioid overdose and reverse opioid actions. We aim to investigate the efficacy of nalmefene on optimizing the recovery quality of patients after general anesthesia.

methodsIt is a prospective, placebo-controlled, two-arm parallel groups, multicentre, double-blind, randomized (PPPMDR) clinical trial. The participants (n = 520) will be randomly assigned into two groups. Each patient will receive either: a single dose of nalmefene 0.25 µg/kg in the intervention group, or the same volume of 0.9% NaCl solution in the control group at the end of the surgery. The primary outcome will be the time interval between the end of anaesthesia and recovery endpoints achieved (Aldrete recovery score ≥ 9) in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The other variables are the time interval from the end of operation to extubation; Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score at extubation; the time at Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) orientation score ≥ 5; visual analog scale (VAS) score and adverse effects including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pruritus in PACU and 24 h postoperatively. ANALYSIS: This trial aims to study whether small dose of nalmefene can shorten the time from the end of surgery to Aldrete score ≥ 9 and improve opioid-induced side effects.This trial focuses on providing the reliable clinical evidence for satisfactory quality of recovery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial has been approved and supported by the ethics committee of the Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine (KY2020-150); Shanghai Tongren Hospital (2021-030-01);The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (2021-032); and The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University(2021-KY-0495-003). Analysis of the study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04713358, Registered on September 23, 2021.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAnestheticsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralChinaHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNaltrexoneProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidAnestheticsnalmefeneNaltrexoneAnesthesiaNalmefeneRandomized controlled trialRecovery quality

Identifiers

PMID36859316
PMCPMC9976492
OpenAlexW4322743976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.