ArticleBMC pediatrics2023
Failure to diagnose hypochondroplasia by prenatal diagnosis: a case report.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathways to Facilitate Early Recognition and Diagnosis of Hypochondroplasia.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypochondroplasia (HCH) is a common nonlethal skeletal dysplasia caused by pathogenic variations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene, and HCH has similar clinical manifestations with achondroplasia (ACH), which can be screened during the fetal period by prenatal ultrasound testing and diagnosed by genetic testing. CASE PRESENTATION: we report the special case of a patient with obvious growth retardation and rhizomelic disproportionate short stature, accompanied by other manifestations, including an enlarged head and short hands at 1 year old. However, several multiple color ultrasound exams identified shortened limbs (< 3rd percentile), an increased biparietal diameter (> 95th percentile) and a low nasal bridge in the fetal period. Due to the high incidence rate of ACH, genetic testing for the hotspot FGFR3 gene c.1138 g > A pathogenic variations was performed immediately in the third trimester. Unfortunately, the definitive diagnosis could not be made before birth due to the negative result of hotspot gene exam. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed at 1 year identified FGFR3 gene c.1620C > A variations positivity, and the patient was finally diagnosed as HCH.
conclusionOur report extends the understanding of the limitations of prenatal genetic diagnostic testing, especially the hot spot pathogenic variations test should be not the only clinical diagnostic basis. Moreover, this case also emphasizes that further gene analysis for patients with significant conflict between the clinical manifestation and the prenatal genetic panel examination findings should be reconducted timely to spare the family from a delayed diagnosis or a misdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.