ArticleBMC pediatrics2023
Effectiveness of antenatal dexamethasone in reducing respiratory distress syndrome and mortality in preterm neonates: a nested case control study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of respiratory distress syndrome among late preterm infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a significant cause of preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality globally. Measures like the use of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) and immediate resuscitation of the newborn after birth are taken to abate preterm related complications. Most studies that evidenced the benefit of ACS were done in high resource settings. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of ACS in reducing RDS and neonatal mortality in preterm neonates in resource-limited settings.
methodsA three months prospective nested case-control study (1:2 unmatched) was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital and Amana regional referral hospital in Dar es salaam, Tanzania. Neonates delivered at 28 to 34 gestational weeks were enrolled and followed up until discharge. Data analysis was done using the statistical package of social sciences version 23. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the effect of ACS on the RDS and mortality in the cohort, controlling for important maternal and neonatal variables. All tests were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
resultsOut of 330 preterm neonates enrolled, 110 were cases and 220 were controls. The median gestational age at delivery was 30 weeks and 6 days (IQR 4.68) among cases and 33 weeks (IQR 3) among controls. One-minute APGAR score of < 7 (AOR: 3.11; 95% CI 1.54-6.30), and neonatal birth weight (AOR: 0.998; 95% CI 0.997-0.999) were significantly associated with RDS. No significant association was observed between ACS exposure and RDS occurrence (AOR: 1.65; 95% CI 0.86 - 3.15). The overall mortality rate was 9 per 1000 neonates. Neonatal mortality occurred only among cases whereby, a unit increase in gestational age was associated with a 30% reduction in neonatal mortality (Adjusted hazard ratio, AHR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.5-0.92, p = 0.011).
conclusionDecrease in gestational age, one minute APGAR score of < 7 and decreasing birth weight were associated with RDS among preterm neonates. ACS was not associated with reduced RDS occurrence and neonatal mortality rates. Moreover, increase in gestation age was the only factor found to be protective against preterm neonatal mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.