ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
DeltaMSI: artificial intelligence-based modeling of microsatellite instability scoring on next-generation sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Global research trends on biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: Visualization and bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Advances in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: How Precision Medicine Is Changing the Game.Cancers · 2025Review
- Lights and shadows of microsatellite status characterization in gastrointestinal cancers in the era of cancer precision therapy.Pathologica · 2025Review
- Qualitative and Quantitative Aspects of Discrepancies between Various Methods for Microsatellite Instability Detection.Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG · 2025Article
- The ATOM-Seq sequence capture panel can accurately predict microsatellite instability status in formalin-fixed tumour samples, alongside routine gene mutation testing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Performance assessment of computational tools to detect microsatellite instability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A Bioinformatics Toolkit for Next-Generation Sequencing in Clinical Oncology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) testing is crucial for detection of microsatellite unstable (MSI) tumors. MSI is detected by aberrant indel length distributions of microsatellite markers, either by visual inspection of PCR-fragment length profiles or by automated bioinformatic scoring on next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. The former is time-consuming and low-throughput while the latter typically relies on simplified binary scoring of a single parameter of the indel distribution. The purpose of this study was to use machine learning to process the full complexity of indel distributions and integrate it into a robust script for screening of dMMR on small gene panel-based NGS data of clinical tumor samples without paired normal tissue.
methodsScikit-learn was used to train 7 models on normalized read depth data of 36 microsatellite loci in a cohort of 133 MMR proficient (pMMR) and 46 dMMR tumor samples, taking loss of MLH1/MSH2/PMS2/MSH6 protein expression as reference method. After selection of the optimal model and microsatellite panel the two top-performing models per locus (logistic regression and support vector machine) were integrated into a novel script (DeltaMSI) for combined prediction of MSI status on 28 marker loci at sample level. Diagnostic performance of DeltaMSI was compared to that of mSINGS, a widely used script for MSI detection on unpaired tumor samples. The robustness of DeltaMSI was evaluated on 1072 unselected, consecutive solid tumor samples in a real-world setting sequenced using capture chemistry, and 116 solid tumor samples sequenced by amplicon chemistry. Likelihood ratios were used to select result intervals with clinical validity.
resultsDeltaMSI achieved higher robustness at equal diagnostic power (AUC = 0.950; 95% CI 0.910-0.975) as compared to mSINGS (AUC = 0.876; 95% CI 0.823-0.918). Its sensitivity of 90% at 100% specificity indicated its clinical potential for high-throughput MSI screening in all tumor types. Clinical Trial Number/IRB B1172020000040, Ethical Committee, AZ Delta General Hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.