Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36858475›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

One virus, many lives: a qualitative study of lived experiences and quality of life of adults from diverse backgrounds living in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mayuri Gogoi, Jonathan Chaloner, Irtiza Qureshi, Fatimah Wobi, Amani Al-Oraibi, Heather Wilson, Mehrunisha Suleman, Laura Nellums, Manish Pareek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hardship, coping, and joy: ACPs' experiences of working through the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mayuri GogoiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9946-2509
Jonathan ChalonerLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Irtiza QureshiLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Fatimah WobiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Amani Al-OraibiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Heather WilsonThe Health Foundation, London, UK.
Mehrunisha SulemanThe Health Foundation, London, UK.
Laura NellumsLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-6951
Manish PareekDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK mp426@le.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-9964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019) pandemic has had far-reaching consequences for people's lives. In the UK, more than 23 million have been infected and nearly 185 000 have lost their lives. Previous research has looked at differential outcomes of COVID-19, based on socio-demographic factors such as age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation. We conducted a qualitative study with a diverse sample of adults living in the UK, to understand their lived experiences and quality of life (QoL) during the pandemic.

methodsParticipants were recruited with the help of civil society partners and community organisations. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and July 2021. Interviews were recorded with permission and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed following an inductive analytical approach as outlined in the Framework Method.

results18 participants (≥16 years) representing different ethnicities, sexes, migration and employment statuses and educational qualifications took part. Five key themes and 14 subthemes were identified and presented using the QoL framework. The five key themes describe how COVID-19 affected the following aspects of QoL: (1) financial and economic, (2) physical health, (3) social, (4) mental health and (5) personal fulfilment and affective well-being. The narratives illustrated inequities in the impact of COVID-19 for individuals with intersecting social, economic, and health disparities.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate the multidimensional and differential impact of the pandemic on different population groups, with most of the negative economic impacts being borne by people in low-paid and insecure jobs. Similarly, adverse social, physical and mental health impacts particularly affected people already experiencing displacement, violence, physical and mental illnesses or even those living alone. These findings indicate that COVID-19 impacts have been influenced by intersecting health and socioeconomic inequalities, which pre-existed. These inequities should be taken into consideration while designing pandemic recovery and rebuilding packages.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeUnited KingdomCOVID-19Public healthQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID36858475
PMCPMC9979590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.