Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36858471›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Development of rapid and effective risk prediction models for stroke in the Chinese population: a cross-sectional study.

Yuexin Qiu, Shiqi Cheng, Yuhang Wu, Wei Yan, Songbo Hu, Yiying Chen, Yan Xu, Xiaona Chen, Junsai Yang, Xiaoyun Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuexin QiuSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Shiqi ChengNeurosurgery Department, Nanchang University Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yuhang WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Wei YanInstitute of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Songbo HuSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yiying ChenInstitute of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yan XuInstitute of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaona ChenInstitute of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases, Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Junsai YangSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaoyun ChenSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Huilie ZhengSchool of Public Health, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China zhenghuilie@ncu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-0757
Nanchang University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to use easily obtained and directly observable clinical features to establish predictive models to identify patients at increased risk of stroke. SETTING AND

participantsA total of 46 240 valid records were obtained from 8 research centres and 14 communities in Jiangxi province, China, between February and September 2018. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated to test the performance of the five models (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and gradient boosting DT). The calibration curve was used to show calibration performance.

resultsThe results indicated that XGBoost (AUC: 0.924, accuracy: 0.873, sensitivity: 0.776, specificity: 0.916) and RF (AUC: 0.924, accuracy: 0.872, sensitivity: 0.778, specificity: 0.913) demonstrated excellent performance in predicting stroke. Physical inactivity, hypertension, meat-based diet and high salt intake were important prediction features of stroke.

conclusionThe five machine learning models all had good predictive and discriminatory performance for stroke. The performance of RF and XGBoost was slightly better than that of LR, which was easier to interpret and less prone to overfitting. This work provides a rapid and accurate tool for stroke risk assessment, which can help to improve the efficiency of stroke screening medical services and the management of high-risk groups.

Indexed as

StrokeCalibrationCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleHumansepidemiologystatistics & research methodsstroke

Identifiers

PMID36858471
PMCPMC9980356
OpenAlexW4322758578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.