Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36858464›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Utilisation of private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries in five rural district public hospitals in South Africa: a mixed-methods study.

Tanya Doherty, Geetesh Solanki, Emmanuelle Daviaud, Yvandi Bartmann, Anthony Hawkridge, Sue Fawcus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanya DohertyHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa tanya.doherty@mrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-1592-0080
Geetesh SolankiHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-3119
Emmanuelle DaviaudHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Yvandi BartmannHealth Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Anthony HawkridgeWestern Cape Government: Health and Wellness, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sue FawcusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Western Cape, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-023276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearching how public-private engagements may promote universal access to safe obstetric care including caesarean delivery is essential. The aim of this research was to document the utilisation of private general practitioners (GPs) contracted to provide caesarean delivery services in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape, the profile and outcomes of caesarean deliveries. We also describe stakeholder experiences of these arrangements in order to inform potential models of public-private contracting for obstetric services.

designWe used a mixed-methods study design to describe rural district hospitals' utilisation of private GP contracting for caesarean deliveries. Between April 2021 and March 2022, we collated routine data from delivery and theatre registers to capture the profile of deliveries and maternal outcomes. We conducted 23 semistructured qualitative interviews with district managers, hospital-employed doctors and private GPs to explore their experiences of the contracting arrangements.

settingThe study was conducted in five rural district hospitals in the Western Cape province, South Africa.

resultsThe use of private GPs as surgeon or anaesthetist for caesarean deliveries differed widely across the hospitals. Overall, the utilisation of private GPs for anaesthetics was similar (29% of all caesarean deliveries) to the utilisation of private GPs as surgeons (33% of all caesarean deliveries). The proportion of caesarean deliveries undertaken by private GPs as the primary surgeon was inversely related to size of hospital and mean monthly deliveries. Adverse outcomes following a caesarean delivery were rare. Qualitative data provided insights into contributions made by private GPs and the contracting models, which did not incentivise overservicing.

conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that private GPs can play an important role in filling gaps and expanding quality care in rural public facilities that have insufficient obstetric skills and expertise. Different approaches to enable access to safe caesarean delivery are needed for different contexts, and contracting with experienced private GP's is one resource for rural district hospitals to consider.

Indexed as

General PractitionersCesarean SectionFemaleHospitals, DistrictHospitals, PublicHumansPregnancySouth AfricaOBSTETRICSOrganisation of health servicesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36858464
PMCPMC9980375
OpenAlexW4322757460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.