Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36858170›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunological methods2023

Validation of the performance and suitability of a new class of FBS optimized for use in single-cell functional assays.

Mark Berrong, Guido Ferrari, Cassie Porth, Devin Davis, Thomas Denny, Sylvia Janetzki, Wes Rountree

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunological methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark BerrongDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Guido FerrariDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Cassie PorthDuke Research and Discovery, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, 27710, NC, USA.
Devin DavisSeraworx, PO Box 202, Providence, UT 84332, USA.
Thomas DennyDuke Research and Discovery, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, 27710, NC, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sylvia JanetzkiZellNet Consulting, Inc., 555 North Ave, Suite 25-S, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, USA.
Wes RountreeDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Research and Discovery, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: wes.rountree@duke.edu.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201700061CNIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of conventional serum for supplementation of media in cell-based and single-cell functional assays has been a major challenge for assay performance, standardization, optimization, and reproducibility. It has been identified as the leading cause of variability and suboptimal performance in large, international Elispot proficiency panels (Janetzki et al., 2008; Rountree et al., 2016). Extensive pretesting and optimization activities are one approach to overcome these challenges, but they are time-consuming and resource-intensive because suitable lots of serum are difficult to identify and secure in sufficient quantities to provide stability in long-term studies. Advancements in manufacturing methods have resulted in a new class of serum with the potential to solve these challenges. An IFNɣ Elispot study was designed by the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) at Duke Human Vaccine Institute's (DHVI) Immunology and Virology Quality Assessment Center (IVQAC) to test this new class of serum against their in-house, validated control serum, which is regarded as a global standard in performance for high functionality, recovery, and viability. Commonly used serum-free media were also included in the study. The results of this study compellingly demonstrate that this new class of serum produces high responses and low background reactivity comparable to the included serum standard, with excellent recovery and viability of cells. A protocol for ongoing testing has been developed to continuously validate new batches of this serum with the goal to make available to the field a pretested and validated serum that can be used with confidence in functional cell-based assays.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayHumansReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsElispotFunctional assaysHarmonizationSerumSerum-free mediaSerum-supplemented media

Identifiers

PMID36858170
PMCPMC11495192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.