Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857859›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2023

Identifying subtypes of chronic kidney disease with machine learning: development, internal validation and prognostic validation using linked electronic health records in 350,067 individuals.

Ashkan Dashtban, Mehrdad A Mizani, Laura Pasea, Spiros Denaxas, Richard Corbett, Jil B Mamza, He Gao, Tamsin Morris, Harry Hemingway, Amitava Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interpretable machine learning for identifying ICU readmission risk in subgroups with probabilistic rules.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. LACE-UP: An ensemble machine-learning method for health subtype classification on multidimensional binary data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ashkan DashtbanInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Mehrdad A MizaniInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK; British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
Laura PaseaInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Spiros DenaxasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Richard CorbettImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jil B MamzaMedical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, London, UK.
He GaoMedical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, London, UK.
Tamsin MorrisMedical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, London, UK.
Harry HemingwayInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, University College London, London, UK.
Amitava BanerjeeInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: ami.banerjee@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_20030Medical Research Council MC_PC_20051Medical Research Council MC_PC_20059Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with high multimorbidity, polypharmacy, morbidity and mortality, existing classification systems (mild to severe, usually based on estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria or urine albumin-creatinine ratio) and risk prediction models largely ignore the complexity of CKD, its risk factors and its outcomes. Improved subtype definition could improve prediction of outcomes and inform effective interventions.

methodsWe analysed individuals ≥18 years with incident and prevalent CKD (n = 350,067 and 195,422 respectively) from a population-based electronic health record resource (2006-2020; Clinical Practice Research Datalink, CPRD). We included factors (n = 264 with 2670 derived variables), e.g. demography, history, examination, blood laboratory values and medications. Using a published framework, we identified subtypes through seven unsupervised machine learning (ML) methods (K-means, Diana, HC, Fanny, PAM, Clara, Model-based) with 66 (of 2670) variables in each dataset. We evaluated subtypes for: (i) internal validity (within dataset, across methods); (ii) prognostic validity (predictive accuracy for 5-year all-cause mortality and admissions); and (iii) medications (new and existing by British National Formulary chapter).

findingsAfter identifying five clusters across seven approaches, we labelled CKD subtypes: 1. Early-onset, 2. Late-onset, 3. Cancer, 4. Metabolic, and 5. Cardiometabolic. Internal validity: We trained a high performing model (using XGBoost) that could predict disease subtypes with 95% accuracy for incident and prevalent CKD (Sensitivity: 0.81-0.98, F1 score:0.84-0.97). Prognostic validity: 5-year all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, and incidence of new chronic diseases differed across CKD subtypes. The 5-year risk of mortality and admissions in the overall incident CKD population were highest in cardiometabolic subtype: 43.3% (42.3-42.8%) and 29.5% (29.1-30.0%), respectively, and lowest in the early-onset subtype: 5.7% (5.5-5.9%) and 18.7% (18.4-19.1%). MEDICATIONS: Across CKD subtypes, the distribution of prescription medication classes at baseline varied, with highest medication burden in cardiometabolic and metabolic subtypes, and higher burden in prevalent than incident CKD.

interpretationIn the largest CKD study using ML, to-date, we identified five distinct subtypes in individuals with incident and prevalent CKD. These subtypes have relevance to study of aetiology, therapeutics and risk prediction.

fundingAstraZeneca UK Ltd, Health Data Research UK.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningPrognosisCKD subtypeCluster analysisMachine learningSurvival analysisUnsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID36857859
PMCPMC9989643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.