Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857638›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Prostate-Specific Antigen Level at the Time of Salvage Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death.

Derya Tilki, Ming-Hui Chen, Jing Wu, Hartwig Huland, Markus Graefen, Osama Mohamad, Janet E Cowan, Felix Y Feng, Peter R Carroll, Anthony V D'Amico

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Real world comparison of adjuvant vs. salvage radiation therapy on cancer-control outcomes after radical prostatectomy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Derya TilkiMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-1380
Ming-Hui ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-2447
Jing WuDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
Hartwig HulandMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GraefenMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Osama MohamadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-657X
Janet E CowanDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-1852-8260
Felix Y FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-7687
Peter R CarrollDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Anthony V D'AmicoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4084-9944
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversität Hamburg · DEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USKoç University · TRUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth the performance characteristics of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and insurance approval improves with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level causing some physicians to delay post-radical prostatectomy salvage radiation therapy (sRT) after PSA failure. Yet, it is unknown for men with at most one high-risk factor (ie, pT3/4 or prostatectomy [p] Gleason score 8-10) whether a PSA level exists above which initiating sRT is associated with increased all-cause mortality (ACM)-risk and was investigated.

methodsUsing a multinational database of 25,551 patients with pT2-4N0 or NXM0 prostate cancer, multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated whether an association with a significant increase in ACM-risk existed when sRT was delivered above a prespecified PSA level beginning at 0.10 ng/mL and in 0.05 increments up to 0.50 ng/mL versus at or below that level. The model was adjusted for age at and year of radical prostatectomy, established prostate cancer prognostic factors, institution, and the time-dependent use of androgen deprivation therapy.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 6.00 years, patients who received sRT at a PSA level >0.25 ng/mL had a significantly higher ACM-risk (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.00;

conclusionAmong patients with at most one high-risk factor, initiating sRT above a PSA level of 0.25 ng/mL was associated with increased ACM-risk.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstateProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36857638
PMCPMC10150889
OpenAlexW4322718353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.