Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857347›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells.

Stefan Bohn, Lorenz Hexemer, Zixin Huang, Laura Strohmaier, Sonja Lenhardt, Stefan Legewie, Alexander Loewer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan BohnDepartment of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Lorenz HexemerDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute for Biomedical Genetics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-7190
Zixin HuangDepartment of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Laura StrohmaierDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute for Biomedical Genetics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3928-6619
Sonja LenhardtDepartment of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-273X
Stefan LegewieDepartment of Systems Biology, Institute for Biomedical Genetics, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Alexander LoewerDepartment of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-3040
Technische Universität Darmstadt · DEUniversity of Stuttgart · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 468927954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SMAD-mediated signaling regulates apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to safeguard tissue homeostasis. However, it remains elusive how the relatively simple pathway can determine such a broad range of cell fate decisions and how it differentiates between varying ligands. Here, we systematically investigate how SMAD-mediated responses are modulated by various ligands of the transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family and compare these ligand responses in quiescent and proliferating MCF10A cells. We find that the nature of the phenotypic response is mainly determined by the proliferation status, with migration and cell cycle arrest being dominant in proliferating cells for all tested TGFβ family ligands, whereas cell death is the major outcome in quiescent cells. In both quiescent and proliferating cells, the identity of the ligand modulates the strength of the phenotypic response proportional to the dynamics of induced SMAD nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation and, as a consequence, the corresponding gene expression changes. Interestingly, the proliferation state of a cell has little impact on the set of genes induced by SMAD signaling; instead, it modulates the relative cellular sensitivity to TGFβ superfamily members. Taken together, diversity of SMAD-mediated responses is mediated by differing cellular states, which determine ligand sensitivity and phenotypic effects, while the pathway itself merely serves as a quantitative relay from the cell membrane to the nucleus.

Indexed as

ApoptosisSignal TransductionCell DeathLigandsTransforming Growth Factor betaLigandsTransforming Growth Factor betadynamicssignal transductionsingle-cell analysisSMADTGFβ superfamily

Identifiers

PMID36857347
PMCPMC10013741
OpenAlexW4322719367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.