Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857336›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Modelling daily weight variation in honey bee hives.

Karina Arias-Calluari, Theotime Colin, Tanya Latty, Mary Myerscough, Eduardo G Altmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina Arias-CalluariSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6013-5490
Theotime ColinSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tanya LattySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mary MyerscoughSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Eduardo G AltmannSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1932-3710
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of the dynamics of bee colonies is important to support global efforts to improve bee health and enhance pollination services. Traditional approaches focus either on theoretical models or data-centred statistical analyses. Here we argue that the combination of these two approaches is essential to obtain interpretable information on the state of bee colonies and show how this can be achieved in the case of time series of intra-day weight variation. We model how the foraging and food processing activities of bees affect global hive weight through a set of ordinary differential equations and show how to estimate the parameters of this model from measurements on a single day. Our analysis of 10 hives at different times shows that the estimation of crucial indicators of the health of honey bee colonies are statistically reliable and fall in ranges compatible with previously reported results. The crucial indicators, which include the amount of food collected (foraging success) and the number of active foragers, may be used to develop early warning indicators of colony failure.

Indexed as

FoodUrticariaAnimalsBeesData Interpretation, StatisticalPollinationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID36857336
PMCPMC9977058
OpenAlexW4322719038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.