Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857318›Full record

Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Clinical utility of the 4S-AF scheme in predicting progression of atrial fibrillation: data from the RACE V study.

Vicente Artola Arita, Martijn E Van De Lande, Neda Khalilian Ekrami, Bao-Oanh Nguyen, Joost M Van Melle, Bastiaan Geelhoed, Ruben R De With, Vanessa Weberndörfer, Ömer Erküner, Hans Hillege and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02726698 (Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02726698 completednot on this map

Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction Between HyperCoagulability, Electrical Remodeling, and Vascular Destabilisation in the Progression of Atrial Fibrillation - An Observational Exploratory Study on Pathophysiological Mechanisms of AF Progression and on the Role of LinQ/CareLink Guided Patient Tailored Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2016 to 2024Enrolled750ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Vicente Artola AritaDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-1675
Martijn E Van De LandeDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6003-5999
Neda Khalilian EkramiDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bao-Oanh NguyenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6043-4172
Joost M Van MelleDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4282-4628
Bastiaan GeelhoedDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ruben R De WithDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Vanessa WeberndörferDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2901-6383
Ömer ErkünerDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2786-1308
Hans HillegeDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-1148
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0824
Hugo Ten CateThrombosis Expertise Center (TEC) Maastricht, Departments of Biochemistry, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7796-4463
Henri M H SpronkThrombosis Expertise Center (TEC) Maastricht, Departments of Biochemistry, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-334X
Tim KoldenhofDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-3410
Robert G TielemanDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-2098
Ulrich SchottenCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1532-3315
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-5337
Isabelle C Van GelderDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2581-070X
University Medical Center Groningen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe recent 4S-AF (scheme proposed by the 2020 ESC AF guidelines to address stroke risk, symptom severity, severity of AF burden and substrate of AF to provide a structured phenotyping of AF patients in clinical practice to guide therapy and assess prognosis) scheme has been proposed as a structured scheme to characterize patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to assess whether the 4S-AF scheme predicts AF progression in patients with self-terminating AF. METHODS AND

resultsWe analysed 341 patients with self-terminating AF included in the well-phenotyped Reappraisal of Atrial Fibrillation: Interaction between HyperCoagulability, Electrical remodelling, and Vascular Destabilization in the Progression of AF (RACE V) study. Patients had continuous monitoring with implantable loop recorders or pacemakers. AF progression was defined as progression to persistent or permanent AF or progression of self-terminating AF with >3% burden increase. Progression of AF was observed in 42 patients (12.3%, 5.9% per year). Patients were given a score based on the components of the 4S-AF scheme. Mean age was 65 [interquartile range (IQR) 58-71] years, 149 (44%) were women, 103 (49%) had heart failure, 276 (81%) had hypertension, and 38 (11%) had coronary artery disease. Median CHA2DS2-VASc (the CHA2DS2-VASc score assesses thromboembolic risk. C, congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction; H, hypertension; A2, age ≥ 75 years; D, diabetes mellitus; S2, stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic embolism; V, vascular disease; A, age 65-74 years; Sc, sex category (female sex)) score was 2 (IQR 2-3), and median follow-up was 2.1 (1.5-2.6) years. The average score of the 4S-AF scheme was 4.6 ± 1.4. The score points from the 4S-AF scheme did not predict the risk of AF progression [odds ratio (OR) 1.1 95% CI 0.88-1.41, C-statistic 0.53]. However, excluding the symptoms domain, resulting in the 3S-AF (4S-AF scheme without the domain symptom severity, only including stroke risk, severity of AF burden and substrate of AF) scheme, predicted the risk of progression (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.15-2.27, C-statistic 0.62) even after adjusting for sex and age.

conclusionsIn self-terminating AF patients, the 4S-AF scheme does not predict AF progression. The 3S-AF scheme, excluding the symptom domain, may be a more appropriate score to predict AF progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02726698 for RACE V.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHeart FailureHypertensionIschemic Attack, TransientStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factors4S-AFAtrial fibrillationContinuous monitoringProgressionScore

Identifiers

PMID36857318
PMCPMC10105835
OpenAlexW4322718498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.