Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36857123›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2023

Identification of Postpartum Depression in Electronic Health Records: Validation in a Large Integrated Health Care System.

Jeff Slezak, David Sacks, Vicki Chiu, Chantal Avila, Nehaa Khadka, Jiu-Chiuan Chen, Jun Wu, Darios Getahun

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeff SlezakKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-9198
David SacksKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3444-6476
Vicki ChiuKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-6419
Chantal AvilaKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-5549
Nehaa KhadkaKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-2434
Jiu-Chiuan ChenKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-0557
Jun Wu *Program in Public Health, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-7112
Darios Getahun *Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-8841
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Environmental and Social Health Determinants of Pregnancy Outcomes Related to COVID-19 PandemicR01ES030353 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GETAHUN, DARIOS, WU, JUN · 2019 to 2022
$3.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accuracy of electronic health records (EHRs) for identifying postpartum depression (PPD) is not well studied.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the accuracy of PPD reporting in EHRs and compare the quality of PPD data collected before and after the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding in the health care system.

methodsInformation on PPD was extracted from a random sample of 400 eligible Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients' EHRs. Clinical diagnosis codes and pharmacy records were abstracted for two time periods: January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] period), and January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2019 (ICD-10 period). Manual chart reviews of clinical records for PPD were considered the gold standard and were compared with corresponding electronically coded diagnosis and pharmacy records using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Kappa statistic was calculated to measure agreement.

resultsOverall agreement between the identification of depression using combined diagnosis codes and pharmacy records with that of medical record review was strong (κ=0.85, sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 83.3%, PPV 93.7%, NPV 95.0%). Using only diagnosis codes resulted in much lower sensitivity (65.4%) and NPV (50.5%) but good specificity (88.6%) and PPV (93.5%). Separately, examining agreement between chart review and electronic coding among diagnosis codes and pharmacy records showed sensitivity, specificity, and NPV higher with prescription use records than with clinical diagnosis coding for PPD, 96.5% versus 72.0%, 96.5% versus 65.0%, and 96.5% versus 65.0%, respectively. There was no notable difference in agreement between ICD-9 (overall κ=0.86) and ICD-10 (overall κ=0.83) coding periods.

conclusionsPPD is not reliably captured in the clinical diagnosis coding of EHRs. The accuracy of PPD identification can be improved by supplementing clinical diagnosis with pharmacy use records. The completeness of PPD data remained unchanged after the implementation of the ICD-10 diagnosis coding.

Indexed as

data collectiondepressiondiagnosis codeseHealth recordelectronic health recordshealth care systemhealth dataimplementationmental well-beingpharmacy recordspostpartum depressionpregnancyvalidationwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID36857123
PMCPMC10018380
OpenAlexW4320065402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read142
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.